Quote Originally Posted by JMcEndree7 View Post
Thought I could help you out on the "next round" you're going to probably want some scientific evidence to help push the 4 pole agenda. Fact is if you go before a hearing with just a bunch of bickering you will probably be laughed at. I've heard a couple people mention knowing these biologists and being in contact with some that disagree with the proposed regulations. You're going to want them to bring a case study to the hearing and present it in a professional manner. This may be vital to your case and will definately show strong orientation on your side.
You missed the point....... What we are wanting is for then to show us the scientific evidence they used to go from 5 poles to 3. Their scientific evidence showed going to a 10 inch 15 fish limit but after one meeting of bitching and moaning they changed the numbers to 11, 15 and 3. Let them show us where this was needed and I think everyone would be ok with it. Besides, I can understand lowering the creel limit to reduce pressure but does lowering the length limit not increase pressure??? Things just don't add up in their changes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk