Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
Nothing to do with reported equipment position accuracy. It has to do with relative direction below the .5mph. Relative speed and direction can be estimated using software based on last known position history files and at these speeds, usually is pretty accurate. You not gonna make any sudden directional changes at .2 mph. holycow! Don't tell me it can't work below .5 mph ........... Geez.

How you think we landed on the moon? It was estimated with much cruder equipment. My story and I am sticking to it.
CP, you've been on to this a long time. There's got to be more to the story than a simple rewrite of a software program. Would a change that makes these calculations eat up precious memory that they reserve for other uses? I can't see it being a simple fix as some seem to think it would be, otherwise it would be a done deal. On the other hand though. There seems to be very few concerned about the donut. Maybe 25 people on here, BBC sent it down the tubes, and folks on Walleye Central, pretty much dismissed the issue. So what do you think, they don't care, too much trouble, or are they holding back just to spite you. LOL! Ole Greg probably put the word out on YA.