Quote Originally Posted by jigflinger View Post
Mo Money, according to the first post in this thread, this decision was made based on 25 letters and comments at 1 meeting. I may have missed it; but I don't see any biological data referenced. I have met and talked with Ron Garavelli and I have a great respect for his work and knowledge. However: I still don't see any hard data to justify this change. It seems to be greasing a squeaky wheel.
FINALLY!!! Someone gets it. They spelled it out so simply at the Enid meeting even I could understand. We have a couple of short year classes. The MLL and creel limit regulation were doing us a favor so we would have something to catch through this "hole" in the population.


http://councemarine.com