Just curious, how may subscirbe and read the newspaper everyday?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tracker123

I saw some back window decals going down the road the other day on some fellas truck. One said "If it files, it dies". The other said "If it's brown, it's down". That's pretty pitiful as far is I am concerned.

---

A little Redneck ! Is it the crudeness or are you anti hunting ?:dono

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speKzilla

Poor poor death before disco still trying to hide the scars where the tricky old ball point pen got the best of him. I do remember your conservative savior rush crunched enough drugs to ruin his hearing (saviors should be made of sterner stuff). While you wish to campaign against disco the world has moved on, guess being lost in time is ok. For your enlightenment please remember conservatism is a disease that makes YOU sickening to people who regularly bathe.

---

Who was first with the Monica Lewinsky story, Drudge or Newsweek?

Who nailed John Edwards cheating on his wife, National Enquirer or the MSM?

Glad you brought up The National Enquirer for that is the news source that flushed the drug abuse of the conservative savior Limbaugh.

Dear LBM your attention is touching, so because you show such diligence I shall explain things so that you can gain some enlightenment. First the post asking for actual peer reviewed articles concerning climate change was simply that ,a request for science rather than anecdotal foolishness no more no less.
The other posts were quite simply a display of utter contempt no more no less. Now by your using a quote from Ayn Rand I guess you agree with her atheism or did that escape your purview.
As for my enjoyment I am truly gratified by your concern

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NIMROD

A little Redneck ! Is it the crudeness or are you anti hunting ?:dono

---

Not anti hunting at all. Just don't believe that if it flies it dies. Or, if it's brown it's down. I enjoy wildlife.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speKzilla

Glad you brought up The National Enquirer for that is the news source that flushed the drug abuse of the conservative savior Limbaugh.

---

So typical.

A liberal will just not answer a simple question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speKzilla

Glad you brought up The National Enquirer for that is the news source that flushed the drug abuse of the conservative savior Limbaugh.

---

Conservatives don't have political saviors. That's your side. Case in point:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlyYTYMHWYw

I am in favor of who or whatever exposes the wrong doing of those in power. Once again you put forth the fallacy of my political affiliation as if that justifies your limited view. All you so righteous conservatives are blind to the fact there are more than 2 points of view. Live on in this cloistered view, you are welcome to it but as your moniker reveals you are still stuck in the 70s, while the world has moved on. Yet my natural generosity makes me offer to reveal the workings of that troublesome ball-point pen, if you ask politely.Remember the eye you save may be your own.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speKzilla

All you so righteous conservatives are blind to the fact there are more than 2 points of view.

---

When you say one negative word about the liberal point of view, be sure to let us know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by speKzilla

Dear LBM your attention is touching, so because you show such diligence I shall explain things so that you can gain some enlightenment. First the post asking for actual peer reviewed articles concerning climate change was simply that ,a request for science rather than anecdotal foolishness no more no less.
The other posts were quite simply a display of utter contempt no more no less. Now by your using a quote from Ayn Rand I guess you agree with her atheism or did that escape your purview.
As for my enjoyment I am truly gratified by your concern

---

I was fairly certain your sign in hadn’t been hacked and am rather satisfied in the correctness of my observations and conclusions on your sentiments with your postings. Though I did omit commenting on the contempt you held with your postings when I said “or in fact you really do relish responding with hilarious comedy/sad attempts at humor just like the most of us already enjoy.” Thanks for the clarification.

Now with you comment “… by your using a quote from Ayn Rand I guess you agree with her atheism or did that escape your purview” shows your utter ignorance and total misunderstandings on her philosophy of Objectivism advocating for how man should live and politically and economically relate to each other without coercion. When Rand’s views on how man should relate are rejected is also a rejection of The Declaration of Independence and our Constitution as founded and leaves only political and economic thuggery and coercion as man’s means of interaction. As one who highly values liberty I find Ayn Rand’s views as absolutely compelling since I first heard her on the Johnny Carson show in the mid 1960’s.