
Originally Posted by
ATM
If I follow through with your argument, am I to assume the fishing pressure is less now since they are dropping the length limit back to 10"? I wish you would have made the meeting so you could learn what the man thinks in 2013, instead of relying on his ideas on the fishery 7 years ago.
I talked to Keith one on one and also heard his presentation at the Butla habitat day last year, I just supplied that article from 2006 because I thought it still had a good deal of relevance today, considering that people are still making the same tired "OOS" and fishing pressure arguments and just the fact that there are still a lot of people who don't even understand the reasons that the 12" rule was implemented to begin with. That was done to defend against the increasing pressure, and it has worked beautifully for what it was intended to do.
As far as your interpretation of my comments, you are just making things up. I will try to clarify my point again for you.
As far as the actual pressure, I believe there are more and more people fishing the lakes and with greater efficiency every year, end of story. This is well documented, and the MDWFP is well aware of it as well as the natural occurrences that affect the fishing year to year. It sounded like you were saying that people were "making up" increased fishing pressure, "creating problems that don't exist" you said, which is simply ludicrous and I was showing that increased fishing pressure is a fact. I believe the length and creel limits are designed to mitigate this pressure. I do not believe you can fish the lake out with any amount of pressure if you are leaving everything under 12" in the lake, you just can't run out of fish that way unless you have about 4 years of no spawn in a row - overs might get hard to find once in a while, but the resource is protected barring some sort of uncontrollable die off. With a 10" limit but a reduced creel limit, I think you are basically accomplishing the same thing. No boat can leave with more than 15 per man or 40 total, I just think that you're not going to fish the lake out that way, and if MDWFP implements this and starts to see the numbers decline, they will go back to the 12" rule or whatever they deem necessary at that point anyway.
If you are asking, my thoughts about 12" length/20creel/20 per each license in boat vs. 10" length/15 creel/40 per boat limit,,, I think that this is more or less a lateral move. You can keep shorter now, but less per boat or with the old (12") way you could keep more per boat but the 12" fish can be harder to catch consistently. I honestly think the number of fish kept will not change a great deal over the course of a year with this new rule. We shall see. I will probably fish it pretty much the same way I've been, throw back under 12", if I want to keeep a bunch of dinks I can go to any other lake in the country besides the big 4, and I can keep upwards of 30-50 fish on most of those lakes too, JMO...I think a lot of other people will do the same thing, but who knows. A lot of people will keep 10" fish and that is fine too.
Is that OK with you now?
It's all over but the fryin'......