Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: So, the oil DID get into lake Conway...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Conway, Arkansas
    Posts
    4,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by Cmj View Post
    I guess my previous post was a little unclear. Im just saying why isnt this guy forced to either prove his claims, or shut up? He is causing a lot of unnecessary concern if it isn't true.

    I agree completely. We are in the process of trying to get his data. The problem is that even if we do get a hold of the data (he doesnt have to provide it to us by the way) there in no way to tell where the water samples were taken. He may claim that they were taken some where in the lake, but they could have been taken from a completely different location. Also, there are concerns on who is analyzing the water samples. This type of analysis is sophisticated and takes very expensive equipment. I am about to attend meetings the rest of the day. If we find anything else out, I will let yall know.
    Matt Schroeder - AGFC - (877)470-3309 - [email protected]

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cabot,Arkansas
    Posts
    4,243
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks D10.
    ><}}}}*> (C.J.)

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Conway, Arkansas
    Posts
    4,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    ADEQ continues monitoring Lake Conway - KATV - Breaking News, Weather and Razorback Sports

    Here is an article that KATV reported in response to the claims made yesterday. It sounds like ADEQ is calling this guys bluff and is asking to see his data. This is a good thing because they are the state agency that is responsible for regualting water quality standards and they are the experts in this area. I also learned today that the Attorney Generals office has also hired an independant consulting company to collect their own water and sediment samples. Hopefully they will share their results with us as well.
    Matt Schroeder - AGFC - (877)470-3309 - [email protected]

  4. #24
    NIMROD's Avatar
    NIMROD is offline Crappie.com Legend - Kids Corner Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plainview, / Russellville , Arkansas
    Posts
    17,085
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I can't see how with a spill that big a minute amount of oil could be stopped from entering the lake and or watershed. i have been told that the reason some small water reservoirs don't allow outboards is cause one drop of oil contaminates thousands of gallons of water?
    Moderator of Beginners n Mentoring forum
    Takeum Jigs


  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Conway, Arkansas
    Posts
    4,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMROD View Post
    I can't see how with a spill that big a minute amount of oil could be stopped from entering the lake and or watershed. i have been told that the reason some small water reservoirs don't allow outboards is cause one drop of oil contaminates thousands of gallons of water?
    It is within the watershed but not in the main lake. There is a highway that physically blocks the cove from the rest of the lake. Although there are culverts that join these two bodies of water, it's flow is being regulated. Water is only being pumped from the cove when absolutely needed. Absorbent booms and physical booms are keeping what reminants of oil that are left in the cove, away from the pumps and culverts.
    Matt Schroeder - AGFC - (877)470-3309 - [email protected]

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Scott, AR
    Posts
    1,489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMROD View Post
    I can't see how with a spill that big a minute amount of oil could be stopped from entering the lake and or watershed. i have been told that the reason some small water reservoirs don't allow outboards is cause one drop of oil contaminates thousands of gallons of water?
    My thoughts exactly.

    But another thought on this touchy subject... Who is to say this guy was not taking samples at a boat ramp where there is an increased likelyhood of mutiple 2-stroke oil burners (read as oil ejectors) were sitting getting warmed up. The same chemicals he was testing for would more than likely be found in the oil that was not burned, leaving the running motor at the sample site. Would they not?


    You Can Make a Difference!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,086
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LMBarnett View Post
    My thoughts exactly.

    But another thought on this touchy subject... Who is to say this guy was not taking samples at a boat ramp where there is an increased likelyhood of mutiple 2-stroke oil burners (read as oil ejectors) were sitting getting warmed up. The same chemicals he was testing for would more than likely be found in the oil that was not burned, leaving the running motor at the sample site. Would they not?
    I have friends that claim "They have seen oil floating in weeds on the lake"
    I'm not saying they are right or wrong...

    But is it possible for oil to be (or to have been) in the lake BUT the test show otherwise?
    Save A Minnow, Use A Jig

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Conway, Arkansas
    Posts
    4,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JigginPoleJoe View Post
    I have friends that claim "They have seen oil floating in weeds on the lake"
    I'm not saying they are right or wrong...

    But is it possible for oil to be (or to have been) in the lake BUT the test show otherwise?
    Joe - if you have freinds that have seen something in the water that they think is oil, I want to know. If any of.your friends reports have been recent (past day or two) let me know specifically where. There are other natural phenomenon that cause a sheen on the water. For example cypress trees will give of a residue that looks like an oily sheen on the water. I'm not saying that it what your friends saw, I am just giving an example.
    Matt Schroeder - AGFC - (877)470-3309 - [email protected]

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Conway, Arkansas
    Posts
    4,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LMBarnett View Post
    My thoughts exactly.

    But another thought on this touchy subject... Who is to say this guy was not taking samples at a boat ramp where there is an increased likelyhood of mutiple 2-stroke oil burners (read as oil ejectors) were sitting getting warmed up. The same chemicals he was testing for would more than likely be found in the oil that was not burned, leaving the running motor at the sample site. Would they not?
    This a very good point. This is why validating his samples will be such a tough chore for ADEQ.
    Matt Schroeder - AGFC - (877)470-3309 - [email protected]

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    787
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D10 View Post
    This a very good point. This is why validating his samples will be such a tough chore for ADEQ.
    That guy isn't in cohoots with Kevin Costner is he. Rofl

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP