
Originally Posted by
Spoonminnow
First off, fish in general know the real thing when they sense it or I should say, as they sense it. No research, just an opinion. They don't know the fake is real - another opinion - regardless of what they look like, taste like or how they move. Let's say that my minnow grub or any flat tail grub is believed to be the real thing by fish and it gets bit more often than say curly tail grubs (which it does for a variety of reasons). Which lure would you use?
Long before the flat tail design was invented, Mr.Twister had a corner on the plastic grub market. Most anglers believed and many still believe that the fluttering tail imitates a minnow. But, if one lure is far more effective at catching most species and the other far less successful, is it because fish got smarter and more selective? Or Is it because of a lure design/presentation combination that provokes fish more often.
My plastics stink because I reheat them over and over - can't be the negative aroma.
Florescent pink in lightly stained water clear down to 5' is still bright pink. - can't be color realism.
8# test chartreuse Suffix line doesn't seem to bother them - guess that was left out of the syllabus in Minnow Elementary School.
So, if fish only attack lures because they want to eat them (even that really ugly, weird moving Spoon Plug), then the only thing that can be said for using some lure far more often than others is that they excel for some reason. Those reasons more often than not involve lure design/action/presentation. Our lot as anglers is to pick & chose those that get bit more often - regardless of a fish's motivation.
Some lures in general may represent some prey animals - in general. But to make a claim that a specific species of a prey fish is at times far more apt to be bitten because it's assumed fish are eating it more often that week, is a bit like saying fish will always turn their snouts up a other minnow species swimming by. The only way it can be proven is if many anglers partnered up in different boats where one would cast a bait that mimicked and one that didn't. Better yet, have ten anglers cast one lure in one color all year long and report their catches. The results would slam the door shut, throw away the key on claims that mimicking is the way to go.
I know, even that wouldn't convince some and at least I tried.