Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 57

Thread: Lowrance SPOTLIGHT Update

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    28,841
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by Cane Pole View Post
    Give me that piece of junk spotlight. I can make it work without a trolling motor.
    Told em that when Lowrance introduced the silly thing!!!!!
    1990 Stratos 285 Pro 200 HP Merc
    SpyderLok Rod Holders
    Proud Member of Team Watch The Finger!!!
    (662) 458-8925

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Boerne, Texas
    Posts
    74
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yep Okie, that's what I meant it didn't read that way I suppose. I just don't understand why it has to make a sweep to update? Why can't it just work like the side & down work? Do you know or have any theories why that is? The spotlight is the biggest disappointment I've ever seen Lowrance put on the market.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Dickson, OK
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Scout, I don't understand it either.
    Kosmos, I thought the same thing, a separate mount that you turn by hand as you maneuver towards a waypoint might work but, why should we have to re-engineer a product for Lowrance?

    My thought is that Lowrance had to come up with an answer to HB's 360 and for whatever reason, this is all they could come up with. Part of the problem IMHO is L is only interested in bass fishing with no though to any other application. Crappie fishing is totally different with different needs and L doesn't recognize the size of this growing market segment. I doubt they have done any focus groups or marketing surveys targeting other markets than bass, if even that. And, I also suspect their R&D budget is very limited and that they will suffer in the long run. I'm thinking they are leaving the door wide open for the Garmin and Raymarine competitors to blow them away. Since both have great salt water offerings it was enevitable they would move into fresh water and have some excellent products starting out and my bet is they blow the socks off L and HB shortly!
    To say I'm disappointed and upset with both L and HB is putting it mildly. HB (or MK, if you will) came out with their iPilot/iPilotlink and after investing in it, I came back to L since that product is a joke for crappie fishing.
    Ok, I'll get off my soapbox and have another cup of coffee to cool down.
    Sooner born, Sooner bred and when I die, I'll be Sooner Dead!
    Member
    Mr Crappie ProStaff
    Jigum Jigs ProStaff


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madison, Alabama
    Posts
    1,232
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Okie Bob View Post
    Scout, I don't understand it either.
    HB (or MK, if you will) came out with their iPilot/iPilotlink and after investing in it, I came back to L since that product is a joke for crappie fishing.
    I disagree. The iPilot with a Terrova is great for crappie fishing. I imagine the iPilotLink is too.
    Team "Itch N 2 Fish"

  5. #15
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My guess is that the SpotLight technology still falls under the general category of "Thin Slice" imaging...wherein the successive pings are received, recorded and "stacked" together to build the image...thus the TM "Sweep" is necessary for the piezoes in the SpotLight xducer to ping successive "slices" of new water to update...

    My guess (also)..is that SpotLight uses 2 piezoes fixed at the angle seen in the Spotlight image ...and the "sweep" is receiving and recording the echo return data from each of the 2 piezoes separately...and then the processor uses the data from both piezoes to determine how to "paint" the image...

    My guess (also) is that the HB patent lawyers have their 360 "radar type" sweep very carefully worded... in order to protect their technology ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Dickson, OK
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post
    My guess is that the SpotLight technology still falls under the general category of "Thin Slice" imaging...wherein the successive pings are received, recorded and "stacked" together to build the image...thus the TM "Sweep" is necessary for the piezoes in the SpotLight xducer to ping successive "slices" of new water to update...

    My guess (also)..is that SpotLight uses 2 piezoes fixed at the angle seen in the Spotlight image ...and the "sweep" is receiving and recording the echo return data from each of the 2 piezoes separately...and then the processor uses the data from both piezoes to determine how to "paint" the image...

    My guess (also) is that the HB patent lawyers have their 360 "radar type" sweep very carefully worded... in order to protect their technology ...

    Rickie
    Rickie, I believe you have hit the nail on the head. Explains it perfectly.
    Sooner born, Sooner bred and when I die, I'll be Sooner Dead!
    Member
    Mr Crappie ProStaff
    Jigum Jigs ProStaff


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Dickson, OK
    Posts
    489
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stymie View Post
    I disagree. The iPilot with a Terrova is great for crappie fishing. I imagine the iPilotLink is too.
    Stymie, I notice you are from Alabama and suspect you mainly spider rig? If so, you
    are probably not using the spotlock feature in the iPilot/Link?
    Down here, we are either vertical jigging or dock shooting. The brush piles we fish are mainly man made and pretty small. You have to be able to position on top of them to catch fish and I could NOT maintain a 20' radius of a brush pile with iPilot. I had a PowerDriveV2 with factory iPilot and later a Terrova also with factory iPilot. MK had me take it to a factory authorized repair center in Dallas where they replaced all the electronics with factory new and it didn't help one bit. They advertise a 5' radius but, I'll bet the farm you won't get that performance in an enclosed swimming pool!
    It may work great if you don't need precise positioning but, if you do, forget it.
    Sooner born, Sooner bred and when I die, I'll be Sooner Dead!
    Member
    Mr Crappie ProStaff
    Jigum Jigs ProStaff


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    8,237
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Fellow Fishermen,
    Send me the ipilot and spotlight scam, I'll pay postage, (up to 10$)
    Likes Cane Pole LIKED above post

  9. #19
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    23,940
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That is why they call it spotlight instead of flashlight.
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The only way for the spotlight to work,to locate fish close to structure,would be to continue ously scan.theres no way (imo) using this type of technology,that you could tell fish from structure without repeated scans to check for the movement of fish.nowopen waters is a different thing.when you see returns then you no its fish.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP