Quote Originally Posted by genec View Post
I RUN 200 AND 83 ,NO PROBLEM DEEP OR SHALLOW,DON'T EXPECT ON A SI UNIT TO GET MANY GREAT PHOTO STYLE SHOTS,TRUE DI WOULD DO BETTER,AS FOR FISH ID,I NEVER USE IT,MOST OF YOUR SHOTS WERE FAIRLY GOOD,THE DI IS GOING TO SHOW A MUCH SMALLER PIC OF FISH THAN YOUR 2D BUT WITH A LITTLE TIME ON WATER YOU WILL BETTER INTERPRET THE DI MUCH BETTER THAN 2D,THOSE WERE SMALL FISH ,MY GUESS ABOUT 6 INCHES JUDGING FROM SIZE ON DI AND THE DEPTH YOU HAD IT SET,HOWEVER I DO NOT HAVE A SMALL UNIT LIKE THAT AND AM COMPARING IT TO MY UNIT WHICH MAY BE A NO NO.WHAT I WOULD SUGEST YOU DO IS WHEN YOU GO OVER FISH TO STOP YOUR UNIT BY HITTING CUSOR,THEN FISH TILL YOU CATCH A FEW ,THEN GO TO YOUR UNIT AND COMPARE FISH WITH SIZE OF DOTS,AFTER A WHILE IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE DEPTH YOU WILL GET A IDEA OF SIZE OF FISH AND WITH TIME WHAT KIND OF FISH THAT COMES WITH KNOWLEDGE
Thanks. So when using sonar/DI together it is best to use the DI to help determine fish size and sonar for locating them for cross reference?