i agree with you that the dedicated Di gets much better results but i disagree about there being any false advertising .Im just showing pictures of results Im getting with the Di from si.the pictures are showing the what i see on my 998s every time i scan.i run 200hz on 2d and 455khz on Di.if i see it on 2d i see it Di.here's some old car tires laying on the bottom i have no problem seeing them.These tires are on ky..Lake but I've scanned them over on barley to an other places on ky. . sa.me results but i agree i could get better images from the hds
(there,s fish some fish suspended just above some of those tires. Those fish are not more than a foot above those tires)
Likes: 
Thanks: 
HaHa: 
Originally Posted by kosmo
i agree with you that the dedicated Di gets much better results but i disagree about there being any false advertising .Im just showing pictures of results Im getting with the Di from si.the pictures are showing the what i see on my 998s every time i scan.i run 200hz on 2d and 455khz on Di.if i see it on 2d i see it Di.here's some old car tires laying on the bottom i have no problem seeing them.These tires are on ky..Lake but I've scanned them over on barley to an other places on ky. . sa.me results but i agree i could get better images from the hds
Reply With Quote
