SI i shallow water

**kosmo** · 03-11-2013, 09:14 AM

i found some more shallow water pictures that i think are kind of kool to look at

**kosmo** · 03-11-2013, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by arkman

It was money well spent to me. DI is nice but if you dont go right over the brushpile, log, or whatever youll probably never know its there.

You can find the stuff with SI and mark it then go back and take a better look with DI.

personally ,i think di is like tits on a boar hog. there will be some pigs that suck on them and enjoy but in reality there not really getting anything

**mduncan62** · 03-11-2013, 09:35 AM

Originally Posted by Stymie

As usual, you are missing the point. Set way out, you aren't looking for details, you are looking for items of interest. If I have it set at 80 or 90 feet and see a shadow or a nice bright blob, I can mark it and come back to it. If I have it set at 50 or my unit turns into a black abyss past 50 feet, I'm still trucking on by.

As usual I'm missing the point? Really? I guess I'm more of a details guy. I'm trying to find things like stakes, pvc, mats, things that are put out in such a way that they are harder to find. I realize how advanced you are compared to me, so I now when I say limiting the distance gives the best results and a clear image, I'm probably wrong and missing the point.

**mduncan62** · 03-11-2013, 09:39 AM

Originally Posted by kosmo

personally ,i think di is like tits on a boar hog. there will be some pigs that suck on them and enjoy but in reality there not really getting anything

Like the 360?

**kosmo** · 03-11-2013, 09:47 AM

Originally Posted by mduncan62

Like the 360?

see , once again,you cant tell the difference.still looking down and under.

they alt to just ban you and me,from this site

**Stymie** · 03-11-2013, 09:51 AM

For a detailed guy, Mike sure misses the point a lot.

**mduncan62** · 03-11-2013, 10:00 AM

You two are peas in a pod. I'd love to see you scanning 80-90ft per side on a 700.

**kosmo** · 03-11-2013, 10:07 AM

Originally Posted by Stymie

As usual, you are missing the point. Set way out, you aren't looking for details, you are looking for items of interest. If I have it set at 80 or 90 feet and see a shadow or a nice bright blob, I can mark it and come back to it. If I have it set at 50 or my unit turns into a black abyss past 50 feet, I'm still trucking on by.

stymie,your correct in what your saying,i also run unit out farther.usaully around 90 to 100ft.im not to interested in the detail unless im wanting to take pictures to post on the internet.just like di ,i just take those pictures for others to luck at, they dont help me but they look kool

**kosmo** · 03-11-2013, 10:11 AM

Originally Posted by mduncan62

You two are peas in a pod. I'd love to see you scanning 80-90ft per side on a 700.

what are you talking about......i dont own a 700.. ... and you dont a 360....

way to go mike...... youve helped kill another thread

**mduncan62** · 03-11-2013, 10:22 AM

If someone asks if SI is worth it, and doesn't specify the unit, I think it's only fair to discuss the media across the spectrum of units. In the HB they range from a 598 to 1198, and HDS is from 5 to 12 touch. What works well for distance settings on one unit, may not work well on another. I know this for a fact because I have owned a 700 series HB. I've owned/witnessed larger screen units. 80+ ft per side may be fine on a large screen unit, but it's going to be harder to interpret on a smaller screen. That's just a fact. I'm not trying to kill any thread or continue your pissing match. I enjoy crappie.com kosmo, if you want to be banned that bad, just ask Slab. He'll do it for you.

Thread: SI i shallow water

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions