Since I was asked my opinion, here it is..LOL.

I have no use for any type of fully auto uzi, bar, ak-47, etc. However, I don't feel I have any right to tell someone they can or can not own the firearm of their choice. My .308 will kill someone just as dead as an uzi or any gun of the sort if I choose to do it. If my kids are killed with an uzi, it will be a very very sad ordeal and I would probably go nuts. However, would they be any less dead if they were shot with a .22? 12 gauge? How about attacked with a switchblade? Lets entertain the thought for a second and all fully auto weapons are banned. A total infringement on the second amendment. Wouldn't that be the same thing as saying you can be a baptist, a catholic, a methodist but you CAN'T be church of christ? Total infringement on the First Admendment. Nobody in their right mind would dare to challenge the First Admendment, but folks sure are quick to challenge the Second.

Some of you will probably respond stating that religion doesn't kill innocent people the way a fully auto does. To save you the trouble of typing it out, remember Waco Texas? Some people believe Waco was nothing more than David Koresh mass killing all of his followers before offing himself before government officials ever step foot on the ground. Others believe the BATF and government officials murdered the innocent followers because of their religion. Either way, it was religion that got the whole mess stirred up.

Others of you will probably say that I don't get your point. And you are right. I don't. Present me facts supporting the idea that someone is anymore dead by getting shot with an uzi vs. getting stabbed 40 times with a fillet knife and I will gladly kiss his/her rear end in downtown mainstreet and give him/her 30 minutes to draw a crowd.