Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Brownback requests state control of Corps parks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Topeka/Emporia/ Salina KS
    Posts
    597
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Brownback requests state control of Corps parks


    Kind of wondering what everyones opinion is, of B-backs attempt to take control of the recreational management, from the Corps of Engineers and hand it over to the State of Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks and Tourism? Personally my opinion is that it would be an disastrous decision for all of us in Kansas, that use these federal lakes and facilities. Input?????? DK
    Last edited by dkv; 10-30-2013 at 10:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    spring hill kansas
    Posts
    3,892
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    can not put on this forum what I really think about . it the women and children prolly would need a license whether they fish or not????

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Abilene, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    286
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I am against that. Our wonder governor and his commissioners who are out for their best interest will not do us any favors if they have control of all the parks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Topeka/Emporia/ Salina KS
    Posts
    597
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My reference to my post was the front page article in the Topeka Capital Journal 10/30/2013 Wednesday

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    95
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The states not even taking care of the parks they control, what makes them think they won't mess up the Corp. ground. Clinton is being half mowed, the roads are sagging in, and they have probably half the campsites they had 10 years ago!! Funding through the legislature is destroying our public lands, lack of upkeep and neglect. Kansas needs to look real hard at the Missiouri funding model.....oh wait, we're 98% private. Off my box now, think I'll enjoy a cool beverage
    Last edited by crappieslinger; 10-31-2013 at 08:42 AM. Reason: Family friendly site

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    ks
    Posts
    1,865
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dkv View Post
    My reference to my post was the front page article in the Topeka Capital Journal 10/30/2013 Wednesday
    Interesting new spin we got here with Brownback. I haven't seen the article yet, but the COE wants out, bad. They been looking to have someone take over mgmt for a while now. My biggest case in point are Kanop and Wilson, both lakes had some work done trying to attract a "lessee". Some study done said that campground and facility improvements would benefit better under more ideal conditions. Hence, most bath-houses had some remodeling and public restrooms were installed. Quite a few restrooms too I might add, Kanop alone received 6, every parking area there has a restroom now. I think Wilson had similar numbers itself.

    There is one benefit I can think of, 1 permit. Oh, oh, another Fed shutdown and the ramps are still open.
    All lakes raise a foot when I step in the boat

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Abilene, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    286
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I see no benefit from there being no competition for the state if they had control of them all. Basically every lake that had corp park and ramps also had a state park that will stay open in the event that the fed government shuts down again.

    Here is the article
    Kansas Floats Letter to Corps About Reservoirs - KSAL.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP