Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: 10", then 11" and then 12" - Why not.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brooksville, FL (Originally from Terre Haute, IN.)
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 10", then 11" and then 12" - Why not.


    Here is an article that I found while doing some research on crappie spawning.

    http://myfwc.com/research/freshwater...appie/tagging/

    Check it out. I would like to point out that Grenada has a 12" minimum and from what I hear the lake is producing good numbers.

    What are your thoughts about increasing the size gradually with the goal in mind - 12". This would not be for all lakes, many do not have the food source like Talquin and Crescent.

    Just my two cents.

    Chuck
    From Steve Wunderele - 10-2-84 --"A fishing trip maybe brief, but it's memories are endless."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,007
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This is a great idea!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Posts
    181
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Like you said it would depend on the body of water but anything that actually works to help keep fish around for our grandkids is a good thing. The saddest fish stories are the ones that say how good it used to be.
    Likes chuckauten LIKED above post

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    Posts
    4,405
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think 10 inch is fine only if needed, i wouldn't go past that though. I personally would rather have a limit of ten inch fish than 12 plus. Just prefer them for frying up. would support a slot say you could only keep a few fish above a certain length if needed for health of the lake, but in the end I'd support whatever keeps the crappie in the lake.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Eustis, Fl
    Posts
    5,622
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default





    lots of opinions about this,............. I was opposed to the 12" limit in Monroe in the mid 90's but after it was lifted we caught fish 15" and 16+" fish on a regular basis and that was the purpose. Articles said they were doing it to produce "trophy size fish". Don't know the whys or hows but it worked. I would like to see a 10" statewide.

    PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM GEEZER and
    SBF
    authorized by: billbob and "G"
    aka: Baconator
    Likes Crappielover, TnT, fishin813 LIKED above post

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tifton, GA
    Posts
    583
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My thoughts is to meet in the middle. Maybe go with a 11 inch for 2-3 years and if needed, then push it to 12 inch. This would give the 10 inch fish more of a chance to produce. Most of us regulars that fish Talquin stick to a self-imposed 12 inch size anyway. However. I often shake my head when i walk by the fish cleaning table at times. I got no issues with a couple of small ones for quick fry, but when i see almost 25 fish less than 10 inches (on a regular basis), it really pisses me off!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tifton, GA
    Posts
    583
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    One more thing, Sunday I kept 18 fish all over 12 inches. No doubt I put over 50 in the boat in the 10 inch range and went back in the lake to hopefully produce or worst case, some chump to catch and keep for themselves!
    Likes TnT, crappielimits LIKED above post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    cairo ga
    Posts
    365
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Last Thursday at Talquin we watched several people boat and keep every thing that bit. I would rather eat a 11 inch than a 12 plus.
    "i only like to fish when i am by myself or with someone"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tifton, GA
    Posts
    583
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jonboatfisher View Post
    Last Thursday at Talquin we watched several people boat and keep every thing that bit. I would rather eat a 11 inch than a 12 plus.
    Might have been the same bunch I seen with a cooler full of fish in the 8-10 foot range?

  10. #10
    fishwalton's Avatar
    fishwalton is offline Crappie Wall Hanger II * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    DeFuniak Springs, Florida
    Posts
    566
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'm new to Talquin and new to crappie. Was over there last week for several days. I guess I'm naïve and don't understand why one would keep undersize crappie. We measured every fish that looked close to 10 inches and tossed those that didn't make the cut. For those who practically live on the lake and catch tons of crappie I can understand their position might be to raise the size limit. For the casual guy I'm perfectly satisfied with the 10 inch rule.
    If undersize fish are frequently on the cleaning table maybe 'the man' needs to stop by a little more often for a look-see.


    Quote Originally Posted by sorrydog View Post
    My thoughts is to meet in the middle. Maybe go with a 11 inch for 2-3 years and if needed, then push it to 12 inch. This would give the 10 inch fish more of a chance to produce. Most of us regulars that fish Talquin stick to a self-imposed 12 inch size anyway. However. I often shake my head when i walk by the fish cleaning table at times. I got no issues with a couple of small ones for quick fry, but when i see almost 25 fish less than 10 inches (on a regular basis), it really pisses me off!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP