Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: CHIRP and Sonar Hub

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default


    Hawk,thanks for the reply and thats another good shot,but the reason that im asking for a side by side is to not only observe the better crispness but to all look for the superior target separation to compare at the 25 ft. +-
    Even though these are not identical targets,when I zoom in I do see the pizalation in the non churp but I can't tell target separation without the two pitures being identical targets

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    8,237
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't see much 2d that my 9touch can't do.
    BUT, the key for me is chirp downscan and side scan, if you have the capabilities, please post

    Thanks

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    south carolina
    Posts
    506
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Still got an old paper graph stuck away in my shop. I believe I could hook it up and still catch as many fish tomorrow as I could with my touch 9

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bull Shoals, Arkansas
    Posts
    95
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brush pile View Post
    Still got an old paper graph stuck away in my shop. I believe I could hook it up and still catch as many fish tomorrow as I could with my touch 9
    Years ago I had a Lowrance X-16 paper graph on my boat. Nice graph with incredible detail. Had trouble finding parts and paper for it so I sold it. Wish I'd kept it now. I also believe I could catch just as many fish with it hooked up as I can today with my two HB SI units.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    8,237
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Come , you old dogs need all these new tricks!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    2,021
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My bass fishing partner had a paper graph on his boat in the mid 80s, detail was amazing. IIR correctly the paper was expensive and is seems he had some problems with the stylus. It didn't like cold weather either.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,423
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Still have 2 paper graph, x16 and mach 1,it is good not to worry about paper
    God Demonstrated his love for us. Romans 5:8

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yeah, I still have one of those paper graphs in my garage also.......no way I would go back to using it though. Maybe it will be a collectors item

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    83
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappiePappy View Post

    I got a better idea

    Use what you've got, and quit trying to have the latest/greatest technology. All you're doing is spending yourself into a state of depression, instead of just going fishing to stay out of it. And we all already know, just like computers, these units will be "old school technology" in a relatively short period of time.

    Even if you had a unit that would point you straight to where the fish were, told you what mood they were in, what color they currently preferred, etc. ... you still have to GO fishing, before any unit will make a difference. People caught fish before there was any such thing as a Depthfinder, let alone one with all the capabilities of today. How ?? They went fishing ... often !! They learned about the fish they sought ... what it ate, where it hid, what conditions were best/worst, and what bait & techniques/presentations were the most efficient at catching them. Trial & error, and word of mouth, taught them.

    $1000 would allow me to take at least four 2-3day fishing trips ... whereas another $1000 worth of electronics wouldn't really make the fishing any more productive (even if I could afford to make the same number of trips).

    ... cp
    Old school Technology is still better then no Technology. I am not saying you need every new gadget that comes along but I can tell you one thing. My fishing success has skyrocketed since I added my SI/DI locators to the boat. I spend less time hoping there is a fish in the pile and more time finding the pile with the fish and catching fish instead of wishing I was catching fish. I only get to fish on weekend. I only get so much time on the weekend to fish. No doubt the more time spent doing something the more you will learn about that craft. But if you only have some much time why not shift the odds in your favor with a few gadget? I use to hope for a good day of fishing. Now, for the most part, I go out and make the day a good one. I feel I owe much of this to my locators. The money spent will never be recovered in the fish caught, for me anyway, but if I can use a tool to accomplish my goal then let me have it.

    I wonder how many use a boat to fish these lakes? Lets just all start bank fishing again. Boats are great technology themselves. Do we need them? I have heard of guys that have won tournaments from the bank. Making pros look silly. They are not even using paper graphs from the bank.

    Just my two cents. Several good post on this tread. thanks to everyone for sharing.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP