Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: 859ci HD "something I found about the transducer"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 859ci HD "something I found about the transducer"


    Maybe some of you that know more about this can explain why. Today while fishing a deep channel I was using a 7' rod so the rod tip was a good ways out from the transducer. As I turned the TM and the back of the transducer was facing the jig I noticed that the jig was picked up better and with less loss of the jig.

    I anchored off and turned the TM to the left (jigging on the right side of the TM) and was able to fish the rest of the time with no loss of the jig and was able to pull in a limit from three locations I did this.


  2. #2
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Are you saying the back side of the cone shape seemed better than the front side of the cone...??

    Good lookin feeshes ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Grahams Forge, VA
    Posts
    7,231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    USS Intrepid CVS-11 Helicopter Squadron-3 1960-1964

    When I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations I have a good day

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yes the back side of the cone was found to be much better at tracking the jig from top of water column (or i should say just bellow the xducer) to bottom. Normally I would have the xducer facing forward and the jig could be seen either a bright yellow which I take to be the 200 beam or a blackish line of the 83 beam. This would be with me fishing just off to the right side of the TM/xducer and having to stay close to hit the 200 beam.

    If I used the back side of the cone (turning the TM to the left and fishing on the right side of TM) I had a bright yellow track mark with no interruption of signal. This was found even if the rod tip was several feet from the back of the TM/xducer. Going back out today so I'll get a few screen shots to show what I'm referring too.

  5. #5
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slabbacks View Post
    yes the back side of the cone was found to be much better at tracking the jig from top of water column (or i should say just bellow the xducer) to bottom. Normally I would have the xducer facing forward and the jig could be seen either a bright yellow which I take to be the 200 beam or a blackish line of the 83 beam. This would be with me fishing just off to the right side of the TM/xducer and having to stay close to hit the 200 beam.

    If I used the back side of the cone (turning the TM to the left and fishing on the right side of TM) I had a bright yellow track mark with no interruption of signal. This was found even if the rod tip was several feet from the back of the TM/xducer. Going back out today so I'll get a few screen shots to show what I'm referring too.
    Something wierd is in the physics here..

    The pulse is strongest in a direct line eminating from the center point of the round disk piezo (inside in the housing)...this is called the sound pulse's "Main Axis"...

    The pulse then spreads out as the sound waves carry away from the xducer...

    The only way any section of that cone shaped pulse could be "better" ...is if the sound dampening material inside the housing were out of alignment during construction and partially blocking some of the round disk piezo from inside the housing...

    I'm confused ...



    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Grahams Forge, VA
    Posts
    7,231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post
    Something wierd is in the physics here..

    The pulse is strongest in a direct line eminating from the center point of the round disk piezo (inside in the housing)...this is called the sound pulse's "Main Axis"...

    The pulse then spreads out as the sound waves carry away from the xducer...

    The only way any section of that cone shaped pulse could be "better" ...is if the sound dampening material inside the housing were out of alignment during construction and partially blocking some of the round disk piezo from inside the housing...

    I'm confused ...



    Rickie
    Rickie, as you know, I know very little about the physics of Sonar. My question would be, what if the "round dick piezo" was more to the rear of the transducer? Would this make any difference?

    USS Intrepid CVS-11 Helicopter Squadron-3 1960-1964

    When I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations I have a good day

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Grahams Forge, VA
    Posts
    7,231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slabbacks View Post
    yes the back side of the cone was found to be much better at tracking the jig from top of water column (or i should say just bellow the xducer) to bottom. Normally I would have the xducer facing forward and the jig could be seen either a bright yellow which I take to be the 200 beam or a blackish line of the 83 beam. This would be with me fishing just off to the right side of the TM/xducer and having to stay close to hit the 200 beam.

    If I used the back side of the cone (turning the TM to the left and fishing on the right side of TM) I had a bright yellow track mark with no interruption of signal. This was found even if the rod tip was several feet from the back of the TM/xducer. Going back out today so I'll get a few screen shots to show what I'm referring too.
    Waiting for your findings. I think I will try your method with my Garmin 50s.
    USS Intrepid CVS-11 Helicopter Squadron-3 1960-1964

    When I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations I have a good day

  8. #8
    CrappiePappy's Avatar
    CrappiePappy is offline Super Moderator - 2013 Man Of The Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    24,404
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Could it be that the transducer isn't on a level plane, and angled more towards the boat ?? Or possibly the piezo is slightly angled towards the rear of the transducer housing (mfg mistake) ??

    Could the transducer be mounted "backwards" ??

    Could you not reverse the transducer's position & utilize the better reading tendency to your advantage .... ie - being able to see the jig better, while fishing "in front of" the transducer ??




    ... cp
    Likes Kenny, BobB LIKED above post

  9. #9
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappiePappy View Post
    Could it be that the transducer isn't on a level plane, and angled more towards the boat ?? Or possibly the piezo is slightly angled towards the rear of the transducer housing (mfg mistake) ??

    Could the transducer be mounted "backwards" ??

    Could you not reverse the transducer's position & utilize the better reading tendency to your advantage .... ie - being able to see the jig better, while fishing "in front of" the transducer ??




    ... cp
    You may be on to something here pappy...

    If the "Main Axis" were pointing slightly backward under the boat...then dropping the jig thru here would have the jig passing thru the "Main Axis" instead of parallel with it...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here are the shots from today. I had the TM turned to the 9 o'clock position and was fishing on the 3 o'clock side. The first shot is in this position. The second shot was with the TM pointing straight forward, then the third was back the way I had it. In the last shot you can see that a lot of clutter was knocked out.

    Name:  S00018.jpg
Views: 444
Size:  41.8 KB

    Name:  S00019.jpg
Views: 471
Size:  56.0 KB

    Name:  S00020.jpg
Views: 495
Size:  51.3 KB

    Was able to get another mess with this technique, to me it's a fun way to fish.
    Name:  2014-03-09_19-27-59_514_zps7dde1951.jpg
Views: 469
Size:  90.9 KB


    --------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pappy, I rechecked the xducer and it looks about as flat as I can get it to the TM. At first I thought I bumped it on the mount and moved it but that was not the case. For now I'm pulling in fish and sure as the world if I change something I'll loose a good thing. I think for now I'll leave well enough alone
    Last edited by slabbacks; 03-09-2014 at 09:46 PM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP