Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0

View Poll Results: Down imaging vs side imaging vs standard sonar??

Voters
127. You may not vote on this poll
  • I have down imaging and am satisfied with it.

    24 18.90%
  • I have down imaging and wish I had side imaging.

    18 14.17%
  • I have side imaging

    58 45.67%
  • I have standard sonar and am satisfied with it.

    19 14.96%
  • Sonar...I don't need no stinkin sonar. I am the fish whisperer.

    8 6.30%
Results 1 to 10 of 111

Thread: Down Imaging vs Side imaging vs neither

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    2,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    OK vik, this is what I've come up with. (Tell me if I'm wrong).using the 455khz .At 30 ft. There would be a blended coverage area of 46ft. using the dedicated di piezo.That would mean, ever thing the unit pings in that coverage area would be blended and shown on the unit control head as being directly below the boat.There would be no way to determine were the fish or structure would be, in that 46ft. coverage area.By showing the two si views rotated and with the ability to zoom each view separately, along with a si view would be a great ideal.(imo)Vik, these views would also have to have there own separate, sens/contrast setting....
    Last edited by kosmo; 12-17-2014 at 10:10 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP