canepoles test

**Don G** · 02-25-2010, 08:23 AM

Originally Posted by jafacman

This is a link to a side by side comparison where both units are mounted to the same vessel and the screen shots were taken of the same structure at the same time.
You can only assume that the settings were optimal for both units.
DownScan v.s DownImaging - The Hull Truth

There is a definite difference in quality...Don't know enough about these units to say anything else.....

**Allan** · 02-25-2010, 05:22 PM

Originally Posted by crappiemax

This is great. Since Joe average fisherman isn't going to understand everything that his unit is capable of, nor is he going to take the time to learn everything these unints will be capable of, going with an objective approach is probably going to be the best for the most people.

I think if it were too scientic it would be lost to the masses.

Amen!!

**hays47** · 02-25-2010, 06:36 PM

Many a politician and many companies have went broke underestimating the intelligence of the average joe.

Careful when you start to use terms like the masses. This is term thrown about by left leaning political people. Of course they always portray themselves as the intellectual elite.

Reading most of the posts around on crappie dot com .I would venture to say there is no lack of intelligence on this site.

**Cane Pole** · 02-25-2010, 07:34 PM

Some features or qualities of the object under study will be ignored in the measurement process and the limitations of the chosen instruments will cause data to be left out of consideration. In addition to these absolute limits of objectivity surrounding the measurement process, any given community of researchers often shares certain "subjective views" and this subjectivity is therefore built in to the conceptual systems; and it can even be built in to the design of the tools used for measurement. Total objectivity is arguably not even possible in some—or maybe all—situations.

**jaxsprat** · 02-25-2010, 07:49 PM

Whaaat- who did that Cane fellar said

:D

**hays47** · 02-25-2010, 08:35 PM

Yep one those average " Joes ". I rest my case.

**CUZZIN** · 02-25-2010, 09:56 PM

I for one am ready to see some results.:rolleyes:

**TnT** · 02-26-2010, 08:54 AM

Originally Posted by jaxsprat

Whaaat- who did that Cane fellar said

:D

I think he said he'll tell us what he finds out in a way we can understand the results

**Allan** · 02-26-2010, 09:47 AM

When is the test going to be?

**rnvinc** · 02-26-2010, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by Cane Pole

Some features or qualities of the object under study will be ignored in the measurement process and the limitations of the chosen instruments will cause data to be left out of consideration. In addition to these absolute limits of objectivity surrounding the measurement process, any given community of researchers often shares certain "subjective views" and this subjectivity is therefore built in to the conceptual systems; and it can even be built in to the design of the tools used for measurement. Total objectivity is arguably not even possible in some—or maybe all—situations.

CP..you are a gentleman AND a scholar.....

Thread: canepoles test

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions