Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: HB GPS - Internal or External

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Norris
    Posts
    348
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default HB GPS - Internal or External


    I couldn't find any info as to the advantages, or I simply missed it during my search.

    I'm looking at the HB's and notice the GPS is an option either internally or externally. Is there any advantage to either one? I would think I'd rather have an internal GPS so as not to have to fool with an antenna, but I don't want to overlook anything.

    Thanks-

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    East TN, Douglas,Cherokee,Watuga and South Holston
    Posts
    2,380
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    if you use you gps to monitor your speed while trolling then you need to get the external because the speed will bounce around quiet a bit on the internal i have a 787cI and i sent it back twice for repairs and finally had to hook up a external receiver to it no more problems after i did this
    Speck

    Real men troll for crappie (Here Fishy Fishy !)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Norris
    Posts
    348
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Any other drawbacks other than the speed accuracy?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Madison,al
    Posts
    796
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    internal will lose signal a lot.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Wagontown, PA
    Posts
    2,233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'm running a Garmin internal, never a problem with my open tiller steer boat. External is a must if you have a in dash mount, cabin or top obstructing the units view of the sky.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ar.
    Posts
    618
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Either will work OK I guess but I like the external better. One consideration is the proximity of the GPS receiver to the depth transducer to prevent built-in offset errors when marking way points based on underwater objects. You will want them mounted as close to each other as is practical. External receivers allows this to be done easier with the transom mount transducers. I also believe the 50 channel externals are more sensitive because they are normally mounted where you don't worry about accidentally blocking the signal where you sit or place equipment, etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Guin, Alabama
    Posts
    4,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luvin.fishin View Post
    Either will work OK I guess but I like the external better. One consideration is the proximity of the GPS receiver to the depth transducer to prevent built-in offset errors when marking way points based on underwater objects. You will want them mounted as close to each other as is practical. External receivers allows this to be done easier with the transom mount transducers. I also believe the 50 channel externals are more sensitive because they are normally mounted where you don't worry about accidentally blocking the signal where you sit or place equipment, etc.
    X2 Get the external puck.
    Alan
    ------------------
    Tight Lines to all
    Roll Tide Roll






  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Charleston, South Carolina
    Posts
    8,315
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luvin.fishin View Post
    Either will work OK I guess but I like the external better. One consideration is the proximity of the GPS receiver to the depth transducer to prevent built-in offset errors when marking way points based on underwater objects. You will want them mounted as close to each other as is practical. External receivers allows this to be done easier with the transom mount transducers. I also believe the 50 channel externals are more sensitive because they are normally mounted where you don't worry about accidentally blocking the signal where you sit or place equipment, etc.
    X3
    It's not the numbers or the size, it's the time spent on the water!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bloomfield, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    1,619
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    As usual, it depends, imo. I've like the internal. You don't have any more wires to run, puck to knock off, or get in the way. Mine is 788ci is mounted right beside the TM, but there will be an offset for the console marks (from there to transom) but that should not be a problem. If you can get close, say within 15', then you will be looking anyway. I don't think there is many gps units that can get that close every time, at least in a ff anyhow. I will say that I block my own signal for my ff when it's on the bow. LOL I have to lean or move a little bit every once in a while. You might not have to do that if the puck was in the middle of the boat and no one was around it.
    I haven't noticed any speed problems with my 788ci.
    Last edited by talltimber; 02-14-2010 at 10:06 AM. Reason: .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    493
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Internal doesn't work as good as the external on cloudy days and under bridges.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP