Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Sideimaging worth the cost?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Sideimaging worth the cost?


    Hey all, I have a couple questions for you side imaging guys. I just finished restoring an aluminum skiff left to me by my dad. All that remains is I need to buy a fish finder for this boat and really have an itch for a side imaging unit. I mostly fish in water 20' and below. How do these units work when using them up front. I assume I would need to mount the transducer on the trolling motor for best results. Anybody out there with a similar setup that could chime in? I have read lots of info on these but it seems most people using these are bass fishermen and have units on the console, etc? I know they are expensive but if it helps put more fish in the boat then its worth it. Looking for some advice from real world crappie (sac a lait) fishermen. Thanks in advance.

    Tube Jig
    Here fishy fishy fishy!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    320
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I feel that Humminbird Side Imaging units are VERY MUCH worth the expense. I know they help me catch more fish...by allowing me to pass over large expanses of fishless water and focus on water that is holding fish.

    For lots of information on using Side Imaging to identify fish and structure, check out this site and the links contained on it:

    Instructional articles for Humminbird Side Imaging sonar units

    The clearest Side Images will be obtained when you are moving at a relatively constant speed in an approximately straight path. Gentle turns are ok, quick turns lead to significant distortion. Keep that in mind if you're going to mount the transducer on the trolling motor.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Benton, KY
    Posts
    424
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Hell yes they're worth it! I have a Lowrance on my boat. It is mounted on the transom and I don't fish for anything but crappie. I use mine to pass over my crappie beds with the downscan on and you can see fish in there as plain as day. If I don't see anything I move on. Just as Jason said, you eliminate a lot of water. Are they worth the money? Depends on how much you fish and how devoted you are to fishing. Crappie fishing is my only hobby. I use to ride dirtbikes and duck hunt. I can guarentee you I spent more money on shotguns and parts than I do on fishing, so you have to weigh the priority of your hobbies.
    The only way to have a good fishing spot is to make it yourself!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    ga
    Posts
    747
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    no there not <im just mad im broke>but get one anyways i fish with poeple who have them and man its night and day
    Alan

  5. #5
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a 987 on my trolling motor. It's really hard to keep the boat going in a straight line while watching the screen. Nearly impossible to do by yourself. If you have the double seat setup, one could watch and one could steer. Otherwise, dont waste your time. Haven't tried it with auto pilot tho.

  6. #6
    Cane Pole's Avatar
    Cane Pole is offline Crappie.com 2011 Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Pumphouse Tn.
    Posts
    23,940
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Works ok with autopilot when wind is down and the water ain't choppy.

    Too many err-err's screw the image, but underwater structure can still be rendered.. MOAO
    Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
    Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yes they are worth it. especially crappie fishing

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    56
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks guys for the feedback, any other opinions are also welcomed. So it looks like running it on the troll motor seems to not be ideal with the constant turning/moving. I have a possible idea I got from looking at different adjustable type transducer mounts. Would it be possible to have a bracket or pole to mount the transducer on that could be lowered down into the water up front while fishing or scanning rather than on the transom? that way turning the trolling motor wouldn't affect it and all waypoints etc. would be closer to where i'm sitting?? We fish alot of small coves, bayous, etc. that i wouldn't want to run the outboard thru to scan and was hoping to use the troll motor to scan??? Just thinking out loud. Thanks again for all the feedback.

    TJ
    Here fishy fishy fishy!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    England, AR
    Posts
    38
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I am considering making the plunge. I have two concerns that is holding me up and hoping to hear from some experienced users.

    1) I am leaning towards the 798 because of the cost difference in it and the 900 or 1000 series. I am concerned that the small 5" screen being too small making it difficult to see the details of structure and contours. I am sure the learning curve is challanging enough with a larger screen SI unit.

    2) I regularly fish an area that I must travel thru a stump filled backawter area to get to. I am concerned with the larger ducer on the SI holding up thru the abuse.

    Thanks in advance for any and all input.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tube jig View Post
    Thanks guys for the feedback, any other opinions are also welcomed. So it looks like running it on the troll motor seems to not be ideal with the constant turning/moving. I have a possible idea I got from looking at different adjustable type transducer mounts. Would it be possible to have a bracket or pole to mount the transducer on that could be lowered down into the water up front while fishing or scanning rather than on the transom? that way turning the trolling motor wouldn't affect it and all waypoints etc. would be closer to where i'm sitting?? We fish alot of small coves, bayous, etc. that i wouldn't want to run the outboard thru to scan and was hoping to use the troll motor to scan??? Just thinking out loud. Thanks again for all the feedback.

    TJ
    u know, ive been thinking about the same thing. it would work if u can figuire how to stabilize the pole. it u come up with something let me know

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP