HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Rod lure weight rating ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia; South of the big A
    Posts
    3,731
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Rod lure weight rating ?


    Anyone know what goes into rating a rod for lure weight .
    I can understand the upper end of the spectrum of lure weight , but how do rod manufacturers determine the lower lure rating .

    I noticed on a moderate action rated ultralight powered rod , the minimum lure weight is usually higher than a similar rod that’s rated as a fast action rod .
    You would think it’d be the other way around.
    “ The bigger the Bend , the Wider the Grin ! “

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    California
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Some companies are super technical with their lure ratings and do real world tests. Others just eyeball it and slap on a lure rating of what they think would feel good. It's typically gonna be the latter. My experience is that companies hit the mark much closer with spinning rods than with casting rods. Regardless of what the rod rating tells you, a moderate rod will give you better casting distance with the lightest lures it can handle than a very similar looking rod with a faster action.
    Thanks gillchaser999 thanked you for this post

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gillchaser999 View Post
    Anyone know what goes into rating a rod for lure weight .
    I can understand the upper end of the spectrum of lure weight , but how do rod manufacturers determine the lower lure rating .

    I noticed on a moderate action rated ultralight powered rod , the minimum lure weight is usually higher than a similar rod that’s rated as a fast action rod .
    You would think it’d be the other way around.

    This is a tough one. US rod UL rod makers in my opinion just stick on the low end what they want to. I used to think the low rating meant that is the size lure, jig that a rod could cast, and work effectively. On JDM light game rods the low rating is basically telling you how sensitive the rod is. Meaning whatever the low rating is you can feel the resistance of that size jig, lure while using the rod. Most folks will tell you that the low end rating of a rod means how small a lure you can cast. But I have to tell you I have not found that to be the case. An example of this was a Shimano Compre UL I owned years back. Rated on low end at 1/64......not only could it not cast a 1/64 I could also not feel that small of a jig head when using the rod.


    Regards
    Thanks gillchaser999, MCG1 thanked you for this post

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia; South of the big A
    Posts
    3,731
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alphahawk View Post
    This is a tough one. US rod UL rod makers in my opinion just stick on the low end what they want to. I used to think the low rating meant that is the size lure, jig that a rod could cast, and work effectively. On JDM light game rods the low rating is basically telling you how sensitive the rod is. Meaning whatever the low rating is you can feel the resistance of that size jig, lure while using the rod. Most folks will tell you that the low end rating of a rod means how small a lure you can cast. But I have to tell you I have not found that to be the case. An example of this was a Shimano Compre UL I owned years back. Rated on low end at 1/64......not only could it not cast a 1/64 I could also not feel that small of a jig head when using the rod.


    Regards
    Thanks for the reply’s , guys .
    I can accept the low rating representing sensitivity of lightest lure , because a moderate rod would normally not be as sensitive as a fast action rod . But then there’s the high lure rating .
    So I’m guessing lure rating represents two different ratings ?

    Also I have found some moderate action rods will load and cast lighter lures than what the rod is rated for better than a similar fast action rod .

    I can see where a moderate action rod should be better at protecting light lines also .
    Interesting discussion.
    “ The bigger the Bend , the Wider the Grin ! “

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia; South of the big A
    Posts
    3,731
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alphahawk View Post
    This is a tough one. US rod UL rod makers in my opinion just stick on the low end what they want to. I used to think the low rating meant that is the size lure, jig that a rod could cast, and work effectively. On JDM light game rods the low rating is basically telling you how sensitive the rod is. Meaning whatever the low rating is you can feel the resistance of that size jig, lure while using the rod. Most folks will tell you that the low end rating of a rod means how small a lure you can cast. But I have to tell you I have not found that to be the case. An example of this was a Shimano Compre UL I owned years back. Rated on low end at 1/64......not only could it not cast a 1/64 I could also not feel that small of a jig head when using the rod.


    Regards
    Thanks for the reply’s , guys .
    I can accept the low rating representing sensitivity of lightest lure , because a moderate rod would normally not be as sensitive as a fast action rod . But then there’s the high lure rating .
    So I’m guessing lure rating represents two different ratings ?

    Also I have found some moderate action rods will load and cast lighter lures than what the rod is rated for better than a similar fast action rod .

    I can see where a moderate action rod should be better at protecting light lines also .
    Interesting discussion.
    “ The bigger the Bend , the Wider the Grin ! “

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia; South of the big A
    Posts
    3,731
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Adding to this , I’ve found that shorter moderate action rods are better for casting light lures , even though they are rated for 1/16oz and up .
    I’m not talking about slow action rods .
    I have a xxul “ fast “ action rod that will not load and cast lighter lures .
    “ The bigger the Bend , the Wider the Grin ! “

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kensett, Arkansas
    Posts
    6,599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gillchaser999 View Post
    Adding to this , I’ve found that shorter moderate action rods are better for casting light lures , even though they are rated for 1/16oz and up .
    I’m not talking about slow action rods .
    I have a xxul “ fast “ action rod that will not load and cast lighter lures .
    I’m with you on that.


    Regards


    Sent from my iPhone using Crappie.com
    Likes gillchaser999 LIKED above post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    742
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gillchaser999 View Post
    Adding to this , I’ve found that shorter moderate action rods are better for casting light lures , even though they are rated for 1/16oz and up .
    I’m not talking about slow action rods .
    I have a xxul “ fast “ action rod that will not load and cast lighter lures .

    I just picked up a TCB65 and can't believe the casting distance. I tied on a #6 jig hook and crimped the tiniest splitshot I had (got to be under 1/64) Put a little shad bait on it and 60' plus on first cast. WAY further then with that 6'3 Abu mass beat.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Georgia; South of the big A
    Posts
    3,731
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MDCrappie View Post
    I just picked up a TCB65 and can't believe the casting distance. I tied on a #6 jig hook and crimped the tiniest splitshot I had (got to be under 1/64) Put a little shad bait on it and 60' plus on first cast. WAY further then with that 6'3 Abu mass beat.
    Congrats !
    I own a couple of those .
    First trip out the tip snapped.
    The tip was replaced with warranty and I purchased a backup tip .
    I probably should fish them more , but I’m enjoying my under 6’ rods too much right now .
    Actually, most of the rods I’ve been using are under 5’6” . Most are between 4’6” and 5’3” .
    My AB MB3’s are just sitting in the rod rack .
    So many factors involved in casting distance.
    “ The bigger the Bend , the Wider the Grin ! “

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Baffled? Me too. I own three Okuma SST New Generation Trout spinning rods, 5'6 6'0 6'6. All are rated as moderate action and UL power. The 5'6 is rated for 1/16-3/8 and the 6'0 - 6'6 are rated for 1/8-3/8. For me they provide reasonable distance with 1/48 to 1/24 and all the sensitivity I need for fishing relatively shallow water. To me casting a 3/8 jig on any of these would be like lobbing a shot put, aside from risk to the rod by exceeding its practical use.

    These are my favorite panfish and crappie rods, bought on the recommendation of a trout angler from another site and watching him actually fish the 5'6 with UL trout jigs.

    Were it up to me I would rate them at 1/32 to 1/16 (1/8 at the most but that's pushing it).

    It seems the rods would be more popular and sell better if they were rated properly.

    Just my two cents.
    Thanks gillchaser999 thanked you for this post

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP