Thread: Are you really iinterested in a no wake zone at the 43 bridge?

DeltaBull, they will adjust to the change...

RustyJig... http://www.crappie.com/crappie/off-t...oat-crash-rez/

I really don't know the answer but I know one other thing that would help(if they do not do a "no wake zone" is if they had one way's through bridge. Like the 3 on right are for going down river and if your going up river use the 3 on the right on other side of bridge. Don't know if they need to be painted green for enter here and red for do not enter...but it would help.

Originally Posted by macpappy

I really don't know the answer but I know one other thing that would help(if they do not do a "no wake zone" is if they had one way's through bridge. Like the 3 on right are for going down river and if your going up river use the 3 on the right on other side of bridge. Don't know if they need to be painted green for enter here and red for do not enter...but it would help.

Wouldn't that just about kill fishing under the bridge, could force a traveling boat to one side where all the fishermen are while no one is on the other side

I think making two separate lanes might be a good idea... Thanks.. Lots to think about with all of these good suggestions...

I don't like expressing an issue with some in in authority without offering a solution. If we are going to plead a case for change, I would really like to have a great solution that is an easy pitch!

I think that one lane each way would be enough. Between the three center pilings for boat traffic. Rarely do you see fisherman catching many fish right in the center of the river channel. (Only when all the outer pilings are covered up). You get there late then maybe you don't get to tie up under the bridge.....then get up earlier !

I have to believe that anyone blocking the way under the bridge would be about to receive a Darwin award...