Now, I do know a lot of local men mainly of the older crowd who prefer the small ones to the large as they still eat them whole just as they did growing up. It all boils down to opinion, and since none of us our fisheries biologist studying the lake, we can only speculate based on our own anecdotal evidence. Based on all the studies I have read, Washington, much like Barnett, benefits from the fact that year in and year out she will see really good spawn numbers due to relatively stable water levels. I was told by a fisheries biologist that in these lakes, it is necessary to the health of the population to remove small fish as to not let the lakes over populate and thus stunt the size of the larger fish. Whereas the COE lakes, with their drastic fluctuations of water, can wind up with situations that produce a poor spawns for several years in a row over and above the cycle of natural events thus the need to reserve the smaller crappie who have more years ahead of them to continue spawning than the large crappie. Just because we aren't catching big crappie, doesn't mean they are not there. We have all heard the reports of the 5-6lb crappie shocked up on some of our lakes in recent years, there are absolutely world records swimming in these lakes. Granted, if you took any lake in Mississippi and calculated the amount of pressure per acre of water, at 5000 acres Washington would top the list I believe.
Now I'm not trying to tell anyone that their opinion is wrong. I just wanted to share mine, as a younger man, I have much less time and experience observing these matters and can only rely on what I have read and studied and as such look to those of you with more winters under your belt to glean knowledge from your experience.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Deck Officer/2nd Engineer - M/V Saint Charles.
2004 Tracker 17.5' Panfish
Tite-lok rod holders - PST and BGJP rods
I fish, therefore I am!