Phil Robertson Banned

**BigRiverMarine** · 12-22-2013, 10:44 AM

Originally Posted by ScottV

I read on Facebook where the Duck Dynasty and Duck Commander merchandise are both owned by the Robertsons. A and E make a 7% royalty off of the merchandise for the Duck Dynasty name. I think Cracker Barrel is removing all merchandise with Phil's picture on it. We can eat at Chick-Fil-A.

LIKE!!! We can boycott ALL business' that don't observe our Freedom of Speech and the Bible!!!!!!!

**windstone** · 12-22-2013, 10:52 AM

kinda confused, i have heard this DD ownership thing in totally opposite directions. some say A & E owns the name and others say the robertsons own it. wish it could be clarified...

**BigRiverMarine** · 12-22-2013, 10:57 AM

It said online what G said. Duck Dynasty is AE, and Duck Commander and Buck Commander is Robertson.

**Big Smooth** · 12-22-2013, 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by BigRiverMarine

It said online what G said. Duck Dynasty is AE, and Duck Commander and Buck Commander is Robertson.

**"G"** · 12-22-2013, 11:05 AM

Look at the mercandise....all that is branded Duck Dynasty has A and E trademark right there with it....all Duck Commander does not have A and E on it. Aand E owns the Duck Dynasty name and the Robertsons own Duck Commander. A and E made $400,000,000 profit on Duck Dynasty branded items last year and the Robertsons got a small royality off of it and A and E got the bigger part of the profits. where the Robertsons Duck Commander branded items the Robertsons got 100% of the profits because they own it. The Robertsons own the Duck Commander wine for example....The Duck Dynasty cigars and Duck Dynasty beef jerky are owned by A and E. Most all of the pillows and t shirts and tea glasses in WalMart are Duck Dynasty branded items with A and E's name on it. Same with the stuff at Cabelas and Bass ProShops.....only thing they have that is Duck Commander is the duck calls that the Robertsons own. Do some google searches and you will see. This was even explained in the Fox new article about CrackerBarrel....Cracker Barrel it said was removeing the Duck Dynasty branded items and not Duck Commander.

**Rees Guide** · 12-22-2013, 11:09 AM

They own Buck Commander as well I think.

**"G"** · 12-22-2013, 11:20 AM

Originally Posted by Rees Guide

They own Buck Commander as well I think.

Yes they do.......They also have their own line of Duck Commander branded items, tea glasses, t shirts, caps, sunglasses etc.

**"G"** · 12-22-2013, 11:23 AM

Phil started Duck Commander in 1971 and he and the rest of the family were very well off when A and E came to them ( they did not go to A and E...they did not need A and E then and they don't need them now. They made a lot of money for A and E

**Speck** · 12-22-2013, 11:44 AM

Originally Posted by "G"

Phil started Duck Commander in 1971 and he and the rest of the family were very well off when A and E came to them ( they did not go to A and E...they did not need A and E then and they don't need them now. They made a lot of money for A and E

Like

**Speck** · 12-22-2013, 11:54 AM

Well I guess Cracker Barrel came to their senses. It seems the silent majority is no longer that silent
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...items/4162125/

Thread: Phil Robertson Banned

Thread Tools

Display

Phil Robertson Banned

Posting Permissions