Printable View
I haven't had that issue.one of the things I don't understand is, when different frequencies are chosen, are the cone angles changing? Here's a picture of 1/16 JIG in structure and a crappie biting it.... http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psxvggtpv4.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc
I haven't found any information on cone angles yet in the HB CHIRP ...Quote:
Originally Posted by kosmo
Rickie
Kosmo,Quote:
Originally Posted by kosmo
Thanks
That's what I was afraid of. You would think that after almost 2 years that they might have gotten around to fixing it.
Seams like the fixed frequencies are working best for me. Particularly, the medium frequencies. http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psjlvt0cby.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc
Kosmo,
That is one great 2D image! It appears that it is showing fish tthat don't appear in the DI. My experience has usually been the opposite with DI being more detailed. Did you experiment with other fixed frequencies & determine that 95 was the best? And any thoughts why higher frequencies were not as good?
The DI view is zoomed, so that makes it a little hard to compare. 95khz seems best for me. The high frequency works to tho. So far, it seems that I don't need the chirp turned on in the Dept water I'm fishing. http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psfqueswbp.jpghttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps8ntvuv1d.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by nwifishnut
Kosmo .... a couple of people have said they don't think their SI is a crisp as it was before the update .... have you noticed anything like that?
I don't no. The only si that I've done, was what your seeing in those pictures. I've got my transducer mounted on the xi5. The xi5 wobbles really bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by BobB
Thanks
Bob, I checked the si/di today. Your right, it doesn't look right while chirping. I think it gets compressed, somehow. When I turn chirp off, it seems to return to normal tho.Quote:
Originally Posted by BobB