Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: 800 khz. vs. 455khz.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #2
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 800 khz. vs. 455khz.

    Below are the HB depictions for the 455kHz SI sonar beam vs the 800kHz SI sonar beam...

    The lower the frequency number, the deeper the sonar beam can be used..but with less detail
    The higher the frequency number, the more detail the image will produce...

    Now, deeper is a relative term...as there as several things in the sonar world that can affect the effectiveness of the sonar beam...

    Water depth, water clarity/water borne particles, bottom composition...are things that can absorb the sonar beam...(deeper water is going to absorb more sonar than shallower water - giving a darker image.... a hard rock bottom is going to reflect sonar better than a soft mud bottom - giving a brighter image...etc...)

    I find myself using the higher detail 800kHz SI beam most often except when water conditions just will not let me get enough brightness into the SI image with the highest "20 SI Sensitivity" setting of the 800kHz SI beam...

    Name:  unjpeg.jpg
Views: 7669
Size:  78.8 KB

    Rickie
    Last edited by rnvinc; 03-09-2018 at 07:55 PM.
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
    Likes IceNitro LIKED above post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP