jeepguyjames (or anyone else who isn't familiar with what a Fudd is)

[jeepguyjames]

I see his methods.....still fun to watch him give liberal gun contol commy's such a great name

"Go"??? He'd have to turn-around and backtrack just to get to the edge.

He's a troll, it's not hard to figure out he's using you like a cat does a ball of yarn. All you're doing is providing entertainment because he has nothing better to do. He never made sense, still don't, and never gonna.

He's like 7up.....never had it, never will

[fishingpox]

I doubt it too, he will get greater joy of killing an intruder with his hands. Just who he is, likes shooting guns, loves the challenge

[Lowellhturner]

Allow me to clairify, as you just did. You said "I believe in no form of GUN control", correct? I simply want to truely feel "safer' than anyone else, so while you restrict yourself to potentially barreled projectal shooting devices, i will allow NO limits upon myself. while nuclear weapons (other than likely a "dirty" bomb) are somewhat (thankfully) hard to secure, potentially chemical weapons are SHOCKINGLY easy to find and use, and if PROPERLY personally protected from will spread terror and flight from them simply with the threat of their use. While admittedly somewhat random and less than pin point accurate, they are both area denial and mass casualty type weapons quite capable of "home defense". Limit YOURSELF to "only" owning and being ABLE to USE guns, machine guns, artillery, anti aircraft guns, ect. I simply WANT to be "safer' ie, DEADLIER than you, and chemical weapons are CHEAPER, QUIET and SIMPLE to use (few to no 'moving parts") AND can KILL far more "intruders" than you can. Agrue with THAT logic...

[jeepguyjames]

if there were any logic in your post I would be glad to do so.......please make an attempt at a logical post before challenging me to argue logic

Allow me to clairify, as you just did. You said "I believe in no form of GUN control", correct? I simply want to truely feel "safer' than anyone else, so while you restrict yourself to potentially barreled projectal shooting devices, i will allow NO limits upon myself. while nuclear weapons (other than likely a "dirty" bomb) are somewhat (thankfully) hard to secure, potentially chemical weapons are SHOCKINGLY easy to find and use, and if PROPERLY personally protected from will spread terror and flight from them simply with the threat of their use. While admittedly somewhat random and less than pin point accurate, they are both area denial and mass casualty type weapons quite capable of "home defense". Limit YOURSELF to "only" owning and being ABLE to USE guns, machine guns, artillery, anti aircraft guns, ect. I simply WANT to be "safer' ie, DEADLIER than you, and chemical weapons are CHEAPER, QUIET and SIMPLE to use (few to no 'moving parts") AND can KILL far more "intruders" than you can. Agrue with THAT logic...

[NeonMoon]

if there were any logic in your post I would be glad to do so.......please make an attempt at a logical post before challenging me to argue logic

Don't hold your breath

[fishingpox]

Allow me to clairify, as you just did. You said "I believe in no form of GUN control", correct? I simply want to truely feel "safer' than anyone else, so while you restrict yourself to potentially barreled projectal shooting devices, i will allow NO limits upon myself. while nuclear weapons (other than likely a "dirty" bomb) are somewhat (thankfully) hard to secure, potentially chemical weapons are SHOCKINGLY easy to find and use, and if PROPERLY personally protected from will spread terror and flight from them simply with the threat of their use. While admittedly somewhat random and less than pin point accurate, they are both area denial and mass casualty type weapons quite capable of "home defense". Limit YOURSELF to "only" owning and being ABLE to USE guns, machine guns, artillery, anti aircraft guns, ect. I simply WANT to be "safer' ie, DEADLIER than you, and chemical weapons are CHEAPER, QUIET and SIMPLE to use (few to no 'moving parts") AND can KILL far more "intruders" than you can. Agrue with THAT logic...

Dayum dawg, I'm almost ashamed to call you dawg.

[DRPEPPER]

Allow me to clairify, as you just did. You said "I believe in no form of GUN control", correct? I simply want to truely feel "safer' than anyone else, so while you restrict yourself to potentially barreled projectal shooting devices, i will allow NO limits upon myself. while nuclear weapons (other than likely a "dirty" bomb) are somewhat (thankfully) hard to secure, potentially chemical weapons are SHOCKINGLY easy to find and use, and if PROPERLY personally protected from will spread terror and flight from them simply with the threat of their use. While admittedly somewhat random and less than pin point accurate, they are both area denial and mass casualty type weapons quite capable of "home defense". Limit YOURSELF to "only" owning and being ABLE to USE guns, machine guns, artillery, anti aircraft guns, ect. I simply WANT to be "safer' ie, DEADLIER than you, and chemical weapons are CHEAPER, QUIET and SIMPLE to use (few to no 'moving parts") AND can KILL far more "intruders" than you can. Agrue with THAT logic...

I sure hope your back ground is checked before you "legaly" aquire all of that stuff.
DP