jeepguyjames (or anyone else who isn't familiar with what a Fudd is)

[HLLeonard]

Mr. HLLeonard....let me pose this question to you.....did current firearm laws that prohibit those with mental deficiencies or felons prevent 1) sandy hook 2) denver theater shooting 3) the felon that caught his house on fire and shot the first responders.........also curious how the gun free zones or no gun allowed signs worked out in the case of 1) sandy hook 3) denver movie theater. the problem with such gun laws is that by the time they are applied the damage is done....another problem is criminals break said laws as in the examples above (and many more I could give).......call me crazy or paranoid but I trust more in my Glock than govts empy words and attempts at control........just my opinion.....gun control is ineffective and only makes it easier on the bad guys by disarming the good ones......I dont believe in ineffective laws.....so correct I BELIEVE IN NO FORM OF GUN CONTROL......

--
You are correct in the points you made but personally I think we should make an effort to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and folks who might not be mentally stable... I just don't believe arming our entire society would make us more secure, I believe the more folks we have carrying guns the more at risk we are from gun violence, that does not however mean I think you should not have the right to keep firearms, it meant that not having a gun available at the time might lead folks to resolve their differences in a more peaceful manner.

[HLLeonard]

please attempt to make a valid point or comment.......that way a healthy debate can ensue......the only validity I can find in your post is should some one be allowed to kwn a 90MM "sky sweeper"....I say sure why not

--
Would that also include the weapons of mass destruction Mr. Turner spoke of?

[jeepguyjames]

--
You are correct in the points you made but personally I think we should make an effort to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and folks who might not be mentally stable... I just don't believe arming our entire society would make us more secure, I believe the more folks we have carrying guns the more at risk we are from gun violence, that does not however mean I think you should not have the right to keep firearms, it meant that not having a gun available at the time might lead folks to resolve their differences in a more peaceful manner.

Mr. HLLeonard......did an unarmed movie theater in Den work out in a more peaceful manner? Sandy Hook? The only thing a group of unarmed citizens achieve's is easier targets for the people willing to break laws......your ides sound nkce in an idea world, but we live in a far diff world than idea

[jeepguyjames]

--
Would that also include the weapons of mass destruction Mr. Turner spoke of?

please dont go off the deep end with Mr. Turner.....lets stick to the realities of this conversation......I said I believe in no form of GUN control

[Lowellhturner]

Or even that battery of 90MM anti aircraft flak guns, in case we`re attacked by our own Air Force ? The question NO ONE EVER answers is "So, do you WANT/ should it be "LEGAL" for your NEXT DOOR neighbor to OWN ANYTHING HE WANTS TO?" Chemical weapons, biological weapons, (polio, smallpox, amthrax, ect?) Flame thrower? VERY FEW of these "anything GOES" jokers apparently "trust" their NEIGHBORS 'judgement" very much; so long as the ultra armed to the teeth decision is clearly given to someone whom may not have as "good" judgement as themselves...SO WHAT if they can destroy the entire neighborhood? If you can "accidently shoot into their house, they SHOULD be able to destroy YOU and your entire neighborhood, RIGHT?

[jeepguyjames]

I see that again staying on track is hard for you....read my post below....its really simple......note the underline and caps for emphasis on my belief.....

Or even that battery of 90MM anti aircraft flak guns, in case we`re attacked by our own Air Force ? The question NO ONE EVER answers is "So, do you WANT/ should it be "LEGAL" for your NEXT DOOR neighbor to OWN ANYTHING HE WANTS TO?" Chemical weapons, biological weapons, (polio, smallpox, amthrax, ect?) Flame thrower? VERY FEW of these "anything GOES" jokers apparently "trust" their NEIGHBORS 'judgement" very much; so long as the ultra armed to the teeth decision is clearly given to someone whom may not have as "good" judgement as themselves...SO WHAT if they can destroy the entire neighborhood? If you can "accidently shoot into their house, they SHOULD be able to destroy YOU and your entire neighborhood, RIGHT?

please dont go off the deep end with Mr. Turner.....lets stick to the realities of this conversation......I said I believe in no form of GUN control

[NeonMoon]

please dont go off the deep end with Mr. Turner.....lets stick to the realities of this conversation......I said I believe in no form of GUN control

"Go"??? He'd have to turn-around and backtrack just to get to the edge.

He's a troll, it's not hard to figure out he's using you like a cat does a ball of yarn. All you're doing is providing entertainment because he has nothing better to do. He never made sense, still don't, and never gonna.

He's like 7up.....never had it, never will

[fishingpox]

I know a guy that has a 50 caliper sniper rifle. Has about 7k in it. He is ex military was attached to a seal team. He shoots big game with it a long way off, just for kicks. He has every right to own such a weapon

please attempt to make a valid point or comment.......that way a healthy debate can ensue......the only validity I can find in your post is should some one be allowed to kwn a 90MM "sky sweeper"....I say sure why not

[Lowellhturner]

He probabily has a VERY GOOD idea of it`s capabilities and EXPERIENCE with it. DOUBT it would be his "go to' weapon to kill an intruder, unless he had NO neighbors within a considerable distance. But TELL ME right here, right now how much "safer' you`d feel KNOWING your next door neighbor with little to zero experience with even a .22 just bought 1 for "home defense". TELL ME, knowing that depending on the type ammo and just better than dumb luck you can EASILY shoot COMPLETELY thru the neighbor`s house and into HIS next door neighbors house...2X the chance to "accidently" kill someone else...LET`S ALL go buy a .50 cal sniper rifle for "home defense" !!!

[jeepguyjames]

He probabily has a VERY GOOD idea of it`s capabilities and EXPERIENCE with it. DOUBT it would be his "go to' weapon to kill an intruder, unless he had NO neighbors within a considerable distance. But TELL ME right here, right now how much "safer' you`d feel KNOWING your next door neighbor with little to zero experience with even a .22 just bought 1 for "home defense". TELL ME, knowing that depending on the type ammo and just better than dumb luck you can EASILY shoot COMPLETELY thru the neighbor`s house and into HIS next door neighbors house...2X the chance to "accidently" kill someone else...LET`S ALL go buy a .50 cal sniper rifle for "home defense" !!!

please read slowly and carefully.......I BELIEVE IN NO FORM OF GUN CONTROL dont know how much more deliberate or clear I can state it for you.....