
Originally Posted by
Shellback
.................................................. ........
It seems to me folks with a liberal way of thinking tend to put more value on an individual rights, than the rights of society as a whole. .........................
Just as a effort to show how folks can differ when viewing the same thing I will try to explain why I hold the exact opposite view you expressed with your statement here.
I think the progressive liberals place a much higher value on society, community, the tribe or the collective than on any one individual within the group. I hold that a individuals rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is of the highest of values and with that unique and previously untried idea, in the history of mankind, is what made this the most exceptional country to have ever existed all due to this countries founding principles. Principles the progressives see as outdated and old fashioned since man has progressed so much in science and technology since the founding and therefore those old principles should be discarded for something new and better. I'll agree we have certainly advanced in science and technology but I'll submit man's nature has not changed one iota since the founding and from before in human existence. It was with the founders understanding of human nature that they designed a constitutionally limited government with separation of powers, the rule of law (not the rule of man) and to function with the consent of the governed all this in order to attempt to mitigate the evils inflicted on mankind all because of mankind's inherently flawed nature. I just think the founders deserve so much praise and admiration for this totally new and untried idea and point of view on mankind.
Now back on whether the individual rights should be subordinate to the collective rights. I say it is the progressives holding the higher value on the collective than on the individual are those who look around seeing someone in need and then, with their omniscience seek to rearrange how things are distributed in society, and start looking for other individuals in society to throw into the communal pot for the benefit of those in need. With that societal view the competent and productive now see their rights in jeopardy to a coercive collective government. With the progressive libs in power they will continually add more and more obligations onto the competent to acheive their egalitarian utopia. The government was fundamentally founded to protect the individual from coercion is now a instrument of coercion on and against the competent individuals.
Now if I had posted like our prominent liberal loon here does all I would have just posted is your statement and said I disagree and you are wrong and and a idiot. Just lob the bomb and leave. I hold my positions with what I think are valid reasons and am more interested in the whys and wherefores of opposing positions since my positions can always be changed by what I considers as valid reasons.
“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” Ayn Rand