HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Side image distance measurements

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Now that we understand that the bottom detail is shifted outward left and right in the SI image to make room for the dark water column in the SI image ... we can explain what actually happens to the bottom detail in the SI image ...

    Below we see two HB SI images - of the very same bottom detail ...:
    Name:  D316BFA2-0BFA-4727-B82A-AB7EF0DC9B31_zpsozwjn4xg_Original.JPG
Views: 262
Size:  95.9 KB

    *The top half is regular SI with the dark water column displayed ...
    *The bottom half is SI with HB ‘s “Contour Mode” on - which basically removes the dark water column ...and correctly represents the bottom detail from directly under the boat outward to the user set SI Range selection ...

    Notice the individual green marks I have drawn on specific details showing on the lake bottom in both SI images ... and how those specific bottom details are “shifted” (some outward and some inward) when the dark water column is inserted into the SI image ...

    The SI Range is not different in the 2 representations - the bottom details at each edge of the screen remain the same ...

    But all the other details in the bottom detail are “compressed” to make room in the displayed SI image for the dark water column section ...

    This “compression” of the bottom details in the SI image (when the dark water column is displayed) - and the fact that SI Range is “slant range distance - not horizontal distance ... is why the SI Range numbers at the top of the screen should only be used as estimates of distance to targets seen on the bottom detail ...

    And the “compression” of the bottom details is also why waypoints marked away from the boat in the SI image cannot be accurate ... and should be re-marked with 2d ...

    There is way more going on in the SI image than simple distance from point A to point B ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
    Thanks RustyJig thanked you for this post

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Brandon, Mississippi
    Posts
    342
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnvinc View Post
    Now that we understand that the bottom detail is shifted outward left and right in the SI image to make room for the dark water column in the SI image ... we can explain what actually happens to the bottom detail in the SI image ...

    Below we see two HB SI images - of the very same bottom detail ...:
    Name:  D316BFA2-0BFA-4727-B82A-AB7EF0DC9B31_zpsozwjn4xg_Original.JPG
Views: 262
Size:  95.9 KB

    *The top half is regular SI with the dark water column displayed ...
    *The bottom half is SI with HB ‘s “Contour Mode” on - which basically removes the dark water column ...and correctly represents the bottom detail from directly under the boat outward to the user set SI Range selection ...

    Notice the individual green marks I have drawn on specific details showing on the lake bottom and how those specific bottom details are “shifted” outward when the dark water column is inserted into the SI image ...

    The SI Range is not different in the 2 representations - the bottom details at each edge of the screen remain the same ...

    But all the other details in the bottom detail are “compressed” outward to make room in the displayed SI image for the dark water column section ...

    This “compression” of the bottom details in the SI image (when the dark water column is displayed) - and the fact that SI Range is “slant range distance - not horizontal distance ... is why the SI Range numbers at the top of the screen should only be used as estimates of distance to targets seen on the bottom detail ...

    And the “compression” of the bottom details is also why waypoints marked away from the boat in the SI image cannot be accurate ... and should be re-marked with 2d ...

    Rickie
    Thanks...makes sense now


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    1,324
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The deeper the water the wider your transducers cone.
    Quote Originally Posted by RustyJig View Post
    I was watching a fellow on YouTube, who seemed very knowable, give a class on side image distance measurements and how to determine where a brush pile, stump, etc. is from your boat and he demonstrated it by placing his boat in a parking lot and towing a cooler out to the side and behind his trailer. He proceeded to show how the fish finder displayed this objects distance from the transducer. Everything was clear to my understanding until he said that if the object showed 25 ft to the side of the boat and that you were in 10 ft of water then the object is physically only 15 ft to the side of the boat. He said the transducer shoots a beam to the bottom and then to the side and you must deduct the depth from the displayed distance displayed.

    This would have to be taken into account if you threw a marker bouy for instance. But, he said if you use the mark button on the fish finder it would mark the correct spot.

    Is that correct?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Sent from my SM-G960U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  4. #4
    Eagle 1's Avatar
    Eagle 1 is offline Crappie.com Legend and Mississippi Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    New Albany, Mississippi
    Posts
    15,093
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Mark fish as a waypoint, move to it, and fish .
    Likes RustyJig, Dee F LIKED above post

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Tennessee
    Posts
    1,591
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    So were better off turning the water column off?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcounty View Post
    So we’re better off turning the water column Offk
    Removing the water column with HB Contour Mode does actually give a better linear representation of the bottom detail without being compressed ...

    The disadvantage is losing the details in the water column that one may want to see ...

    Rickie
    Last edited by rnvinc; 12-30-2019 at 09:16 PM.
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
    Likes RustyJig, RogerA LIKED above post

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Madison MS
    Posts
    224
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RustyJig View Post
    I was watching a fellow on YouTube, who seemed very knowable, give a class on side image distance measurements and how to determine where a brush pile, stump, etc. is from your boat and he demonstrated it by placing his boat in a parking lot and towing a cooler out to the side and behind his trailer. He proceeded to show how the fish finder displayed this objects distance from the transducer. Everything was clear to my understanding until he said that if the object showed 25 ft to the side of the boat and that you were in 10 ft of water then the object is physically only 15 ft to the side of the boat. He said the transducer shoots a beam to the bottom and then to the side and you must deduct the depth from the displayed distance displayed.

    This would have to be taken into account if you threw a marker bouy for instance. But, he said if you use the mark button on the fish finder it would mark the correct spot.

    Is that correct?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    After reading all of this I have decided that Im too dumb to use electronics.


    Sent from my iPad using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Brandon, Mississippi
    Posts
    342
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roachjwr View Post
    After reading all of this I have decided that Im too dumb to use electronics.


    Sent from my iPad using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
    May have to go back to cane pole, Cork and minnow


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Eagle 1's Avatar
    Eagle 1 is offline Crappie.com Legend and Mississippi Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    New Albany, Mississippi
    Posts
    15,093
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    rnvinc , If we are in 30 ft,deep of water
    (or less )and set the side image to 40 yds . we would never be off more than a jig pole length(approximately 12 ft ) would we ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Brandon, Mississippi
    Posts
    342
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle 1 View Post
    rnvinc , If we are in 30 ft,deep of water
    (or less )and set the side image to 40 yds . we would never be off more than a jig pole length(approximately 12 ft ) would we ?
    Did you mean 40 ft? Instead of yards. If I put my small screen on 120 ft it compresses the pixels to where a stump looks like a dot. LOL


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP