Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: I never see arches on HB 688

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    57
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default I never see arches on HB 688


    I fish a lot and use my HB 688DI exclusively. I never see the arches that signify fish. Last week I was in a lake with lots of big walleyes, northerns, bass and didn't see one arch. I had my fish alarm on and set for large fish only and it would beep at me. It would show a fish in the middle of my depth range with the number (depth) next to it, but the shape was not an arch. I hate to use the fish id but with the lack of arches I wanted to see where the fish were.

    Is the arch a factor of chart speed and sonar sensitivity? I have made several different adjustments to speed and no difference.

    I am home now and may not get out until next week. In May I was with a guide in South Dakota and I saw all kinds of arches on his screen.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    6,070
    Post Thanks / Like

  3. #3
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Scrat has provided some very good references ...
    -----

    The biggest detriment in obtaining fish arches in the HB DI unit is the narrower sonar cone angles (as compared to the other HB Dual Beam Sonar cone angles) ...

    The other HB Dual Beam units have a 20° 200kHz Sonar cone and a 60° 83kHz Sonar cone ...

    The HB DI units have a 16° 455kHz Sonar cone and a 28° 200kHz Sonar cone ...

    That's just not a wide enough cone angle for the fish to be at different distances from the xducer while in the narrow Sonar cone (as we know that the arch is created by the fish being farther away from the xducer at the edges of the Sonar cone than when the fish is in the center of the Sonar cone) ...



    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    57
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks, so if I stay in the 200mhz frequency i am more likely to see more of an arch as it is the wider field. I like the resources Scrat provided as well.

    Thanks guys.

  5. #5
    rnvinc's Avatar
    rnvinc is offline Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year * Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Ky
    Posts
    13,291
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Royalwapiti View Post
    Thanks, so if I stay in the 200mhz frequency i am more likely to see more of an arch as it is the wider field. I like the resources Scrat provided as well.

    Thanks guys.
    Correct ... The wider the Sonar cone - the more likely it can paint an arch ...

    Rickie
    www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
    ------------—————
    https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
    https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/

    ------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP