Ford or Chevy, it's about the same arguement.
Those who have one model will swear it's the best and vice versa. They both work, they both have some features/support the others don't.
I have the Humminbird with side imaging and really like it. Easy to use and gets the job done. I like the updates pop out 2 to 4 times a year and the old models get updated too (if possible). I don't like the small screen (798) but I can't justify the bigger unit's price. HB has the sideimaging already included with the base unit. Lowrance does allow you to buy the finder then if you want the side imaging, you can buy it later. That might work better for some people. I'm sure some Lowrance guys will add their comments too.
I reread your post and you wanted to know why/why not I liked my unit. I like that it just works. I'm a techie type guy and like messing with settings and such. My phone is rooted and has custom roms and home built programs on it. My home tv is a home theater pc that runs everything exept the lights in the room. I like adjusting and modding things. BUT when on the water, I'd rather fish. My HB gives me 20 sensativity settings for each type of imaging. If I read right, Low. gives you 100(?). I might sit there all day adjust between 55 and 57 to figure out which worked better. I can assign 3 buttons to my favorite screens, I wish I had 6 buttons though. There is a LOT of help from HB guys on many different forums. I don't know about Low assistance from the pros, (but then, i don't own one so I wouldn't be looking for it either). If I were to buy again, I'd buy the unit with the external GPS puck instead of internal. I find myself searching a bit more that I think is necessary to find the structure I marked - but on the other hand, I found structure that I didn't know about before, sooooo... I think I'm still ahead.
My only real con is that I don't have 2 on the boat - yet.


Likes:
Thanks:
HaHa: 
Reply With Quote

















