
Originally Posted by
CrappieCrazed
I don't prefer one over the other to be honest but I have to disagree with the statement above especially when your talking side imaging. My uncle and I trade off trip for trip. He has the hds8 on his boat and I have the hb997 on mine. I find the his down imaging to be a little better than my bird but when It comes to the side imaging there is no ifs ands or buts about it my bird is far more superior to his hds.
Ill give you a very good example. This spring we had loads and loads of shad in our creeks off the ohio river and man you could actually count the shad on the screen of the 997 and each individual fish had a shadow directly underneath them. With his hds unit no matter what settings we had on his unit you just got almost the same as if you had propwash on both sides of the boat. It was just an absolute no brainer so we started taking a lot more trips on my boat for finding structure when scanning the creeks. Tree tops just showed up as clutter where with mine it was like you painted a tree top on my screen. Don't get me wrong, with the hds we knew the structure was there but the detail just wasnt quite as good as the 997. As for the 2d now I like the lowrance a LOT more than my bird.
Hey maybe his transducer isnt quite set right or something but Ive got to see the same structure on both graphs and im just not as impressed with the hds as with the bird. Not to mention I got a screen just as large as his, only have to deal with one transducer, and payed a hell of a lot less.
The beauty of the picture screen is operator dependent.
Member BS Pro-Staff and Billbob Pro-Staff
Proud Member of Team Geezer... authorized by: billbob and "G"