Thanks: 
HaHa: 
Reply With Quote[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0318144052_zpskq719l0_edit_1416237149931_zpssro pmpsd.jpg.html][/URL
Crappie.com 2K Star General
Onizuka 10 vs. 998 with rotated transducer (surprising comparisons)
[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0328145300_zpslfxwqtc_edit_1416237886731_zps12o 5skjm.jpg.html][/URL
Crappie.com 2K Star General
[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0318144052_zpskq719l0_edit_1416237149931_zpssro pmpsd.jpg.html]
Crappie.com 2K Star General
[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0326144340_zpsywx6vdp_edit_1416238997030_zpskx7 iac1g.jpg.html][/URL
Super Moderator - 2013 Man Of The Year
* Crappie.com Supporter
Well, Kosmo ... I look at these beautiful representations of the images of some really good looking cover, that fish are very likely to be using at some point in time (or are already there), and I can't help but wonder :
WHY IN THE WORLD would someone waste screen space, or pay for a unit whose resources are diminished by the "old school" 2d rendering, when it takes a comparison to the DI image to properly identify what that 2d image ACTUALLY is
I mean, even with all the pretty colors, and the color differences supposedly showing different degrees of gradient solidity ... most of the time, all those 2d images look like is a "bush"even when the DI image clearly shows that they are, in fact, something completely different.
.... cp
wilbur LIKED above post
Crappie Wall Hanger
Neat pictures, Kosmo...... did you rotate transducer 90 degrees or more or less. What transducer were you using?
I DO MY BEST PROOFREADING RIGHT AFTER I HIT THE "SUBMIT" BUTON
Crappie.com Legend - 2017 Man Of The Year
Very nice Kosmo!
Crappie.com 2K Star General
The 998 was using the stock transducer, rotated 60 degreesOriginally Posted by cache22
Crappie.com 3K Star General
THEY LOOK GREAT
God Demonstrated his love for us.Romans 5:8
Crappie.com 2016 Man of the Year
* Member Sponsor
That's a great comparison kosmo ...
There's not as much difference as even I expected ...
Which software version is in the 998 ... ??
Rickie
www.podunkideas.com <--Click here
------------—————
https://www.crappie-gills-n-more.com/
https://cornfieldfishinggear.com/
------------------------>> Pro Staff Sonar Advisor
Crappie.com 2K Star General
I agree, there's not as much difference as I expected.the 998 is a little more fuzzy than the onix, but I also had the scroll speed turned up on the 998 shots, which probably contributed to some of the fuzz.the 998 software verso is the most recent release.
These are not same day, side by side pictures.i took the 998 pictures while experimenting with the rotated transducer.later I removed the 998 and replaced it with the onix.
After looking over some of my old pictures, using the 998, I compared them with the onix pictures.
I think later on, I will increase the scroll speed on the onix to see what difference it makes.
Posting Permissions
