If the 585C is the color upgrade of the 565 why does the 585C have fewer pixels?
585C 240H x 320V
565 320H x 640V
Looks like you would see a lot more detail with the 565 or does color make up the difference...
Printable View
If the 585C is the color upgrade of the 565 why does the 585C have fewer pixels?
585C 240H x 320V
565 320H x 640V
Looks like you would see a lot more detail with the 565 or does color make up the difference...
That was the reason why I bought the 565 vs 585....more pixels.
I also bought the 777C2 for the same reason....more pixels.
It makes a big difference.
Trickery in advertising...Good ol boys.
Upgrade to a downgrade.
The same reason that you'd pay more for a color tv than you would a black and white one. I have both color and greyscale fishfinder's. As soon as I can save up a lil more money the greyscale one is history. There's no comparison, color all the way!
Then why is black and white film more expensive than color film if this be the case?Quote:
Originally Posted by daltreypark
Now your talking nostalgia. Same reason a Babe Ruth card would be worth more than a Barry Bonds one. Plus it takes alot of money to make old things look new again, perfect example would be Micheal Jackson.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daltreypark
:):):)
We fish a jig, we call a Micheal Jackson its a Black and white Jig.Quote:
Originally Posted by daltreypark
I like Michael Jackson, but man, he had the longest running case of the crabs of anybody I ever knowed. He been a diggin for 40 years.
He scratches little crabs also :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cane Pole
Thats funny!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Jones
Quote:
Originally Posted by crappielimits
Ha.
Us 2 legged talking critters are somthin'. Michale Jackson buying shoe polish to make himself whiter and I am buying tanning oil to make myself blacker.
What the heck....