More pictures taken on the 5th

I thought all of these looked interesting.[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01640_zpsajypicdi.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psajypicdi.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01639_zps44c9zgiy.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps44c9zgiy.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01638_zpsikhu2fvs.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psikhu2fvs.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01638_zpsikhu2fvs.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psikhu2fvs.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01634_zps9sejw8e4.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps9sejw8e4.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01623_zpszwsgvqb7.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pszwsgvqb7.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01621_zpsdl5qdcsa.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psdl5qdcsa.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01606_zpsz4jbdtxp.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psz4jbdtxp.png[/URLhttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps7sm9nkop.png

Neat!

In the SecoND picture,the thing that I found interesting was the way the DI flipped the object an blended it in a way that it's being displayed incorrectly to the way it is accually laying on the bottom.compared to si,in that picture.

"DI from SI" in the core HB SI units ...

*Take the right Si sonar and rotate it 90 degrees clockwise ...
*Take the left Si sonar and flip it horizontally (mirror image) and then rotate it 90 degrees clockwise ...
*Overlay the two images and you have the "DI from SI" sonar image ...

http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/r...ps3t7zpg30.png

Rickie

The 6 picture down from top.while traveling up the lake,there's two signs that read,under water gas line.I believe that's what's being displayed in that shot.there appears to be two gas lines running across the bottom of the lake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kosmo

The 6 picture down from top.while traveling up the lake,there's two signs that read,under water gas line.I believe that's what's being displayed in that shot.there appears to be two gas lines running across the bottom of the lake

---

You would be correct there kos ...(the pipelines are marked on your Navionics map) ...

http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/r...psvcj93jgp.png

I've heard of sauger fisherman targeting areas around those pipelines ...

Rickie

What is a sauger:dono:biggrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kosmo

What is a sauger:dono:biggrin

---

Walleye wannabe :Rofl

... cp :kewl

Whats with all the lines on some Si pics.

And curious why 2d sensitivety is so high.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MonteSS

Whats with all the lines on some Si pics.

And curious why 2d sensitivety is so high.

---

I'm glad u asked this.your not just glancing at the pictures.u looking at details.:ThumbsUp
I really wasn't using my unit that day.Just had it on,while out playing,just glancing down at times,seeing things that looked interesting and saving the pictures. There were times that I did have to adjust the sensitivity, but for the most part,I didn't do much .what u seeing is for the most part,is just stuff that I happened to see if I glanced down at the unit and thought ,oh like looks kool,then just saved it. (I run my unit with the noise settings turned off.so I do pick up motor noise and also when I get close to others ,out on the water,sometimes my unit will pick up noise from them. (There were lots of others out,that day)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MonteSS

Whats with all the lines on some Si pics.

---

The images with the lines were scanned at over 20mph ...

Rickie

Rickie,I can,get rid of those interference lines by turning on filters.also those scans at 20+,can go up to 50mph. (Lake was to ruff.lots of boats out playing,just like me)once my boat gets up to,or close to 50,the DI seams to do a better job of reading the bottom than 2d.not sure why tho?

Kosmo, post up a pic of how you have your TD mounted, interested how far under the water it is at the 20 mph.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Redge

Kosmo, post up a pic of how you have your TD mounted, interested how far under the water it is at the 20 mph.

---

I don't no redge,I might get hurt trying to get that shot:yikes:Rofl

Sorry montess,I read your post wrong,about the interference lines.I thought u were posting about the 2d intreference u were posting about the si.not sure if I could get much better of a picture,while running at those speeds

Man 20mph!!!! Im washing ut at 8! I lowered it deeper into the water and get an even highe rooster tail from it and it washes out at an even slower speed. Please post pik of your transducer! :biggrin

Here three more pictures that I took on the fifth.The objects all show on si and di.Do u think my boat went directly over them. (My 2d was set to 83/200[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01629_zpspbxf45oi.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pspbxf45oi.png[/URL[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/S01625_zpsaf9vf9mz.png.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psaf9vf9mz.png[/URLhttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pskf2pliay.png

They were all to the left side of the boat.

I am glad that you are posting these. I am trying to learn how to interpret SI and DI currently so having images that the content is know is a great help. So while I am most likely incorrect in my interpretation of your images I will try for my own education.
I do not think that your boat went directly over the objects. It appears that all of them are slightly to the left of the boat in the water column at the time of image capture. If you went directly over them, they should appear in the water column on both sides of the SI track path. On the right side of the image I do not see any structure or shadows to indicate that the right beam struck and caused a return or had the beam absorbed by anything resembling the returns from the left side of the image.
I could be completely wrong, I am probably completely wrong, but nothing ventured nothing gained.
Dennis

I think you are completely right ..... errrr completely correct.

I think I agree,that I didn't go directly over those objects.tell me why all of those objects are showing in the water column tho.

Any object that is closer to the transducer than the depth of the water will show in the water column.

agreed