[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0328145300_zpslfxwqtc_edit_1416237886731_zps12o 5skjm.jpg.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps12o5skjm.jpg[/URLhttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...sau2z9gzc.jpeghttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...s9kpqrs6m.jpeghttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psjklto64z.jpg
[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0318144052_zpskq719l0_edit_1416237149931_zpssro pmpsd.jpg.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pssropmpsd.jpg[/URLhttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...spqt8m9kv.jpeg
[URL=http://s826.photobucket.com/user/kosmo012/media/Mobile%20Uploads/snp0326144340_zpsywx6vdp_edit_1416238997030_zpskx7 iac1g.jpg.html]http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pskx7iac1g.jpg[/URLhttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...sv24840ka.jpeg
Well, Kosmo ... I look at these beautiful representations of the images of some really good looking cover, that fish are very likely to be using at some point in time (or are already there), and I can't help but wonder :
WHY IN THE WORLD would someone waste screen space, or pay for a unit whose resources are diminished by the "old school" 2d rendering, when it takes a comparison to the DI image to properly identify what that 2d image ACTUALLY is :dono :scratchhead :confused: :banghead :Rofl
I mean, even with all the pretty colors, and the color differences supposedly showing different degrees of gradient solidity ... most of the time, all those 2d images look like is a "bush" :Doh: even when the DI image clearly shows that they are, in fact, something completely different.
.... cp :kewl
Neat pictures, Kosmo...... did you rotate transducer 90 degrees or more or less. What transducer were you using?
Very nice Kosmo!
The 998 was using the stock transducer, rotated 60 degreesQuote:
Originally Posted by cache22
THEY LOOK GREAT
That's a great comparison kosmo ...
There's not as much difference as even I expected ...
Which software version is in the 998 ... ??
Rickie
I agree, there's not as much difference as I expected.the 998 is a little more fuzzy than the onix, but I also had the scroll speed turned up on the 998 shots, which probably contributed to some of the fuzz.the 998 software verso is the most recent release.Quote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc
These are not same day, side by side pictures.i took the 998 pictures while experimenting with the rotated transducer.later I removed the 998 and replaced it with the onix.
After looking over some of my old pictures, using the 998, I compared them with the onix pictures.
I think later on, I will increase the scroll speed on the onix to see what difference it makes.
If it's OK with you, I would like to post your comparison shots at BBC in Genec's latest thread about the rotated HDSI xducer ...
Rickie
KOMOS,ON SOME ,NOT SURE WHICH IS WHICH FOR U CAN'T GET SI WHILE RUNNING TILTED DUCER AT SAME TIME,SO WOULD THOSE WITH 3 OR MORE PIC IN ONE FRAME BE ONIX,I KNOW THE ONE BIG PIC NEXT TO LAST GOT TO BE ONIX FOR I HAVE NEVER SEEN BETTER
WOULD BE NICE RICKIE
Yea, that's fine.....Quote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc