The response I got back from Sen Wicker's office

Thank you for contacting me to express your support for the constitutional right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms. I am glad to have the benefit of your views on this important issue.

Since coming to Congress in 1995, I have consistently voted to protect our Second Amendment freedoms and will continue to do so. On April 11, 2013, I supported, along with 15 other Republican Senators, a procedural motion on debating S. 649, the so-called Safe Schools Act.

I believe that S. 649 is deeply flawed legislation, and I oppose the measure. However, this vote signals the opening of a robust debate that will put the Senate on record regarding a basic constitutional right. Far from shrinking from it, I welcome such a discussion and believe it is long overdue.

The Founding Fathers conceived of the U.S. Senate as the proper forum for public deliberation of this kind. Law-abiding gun owners should not be put on the defensive when it comes to a fundamental American freedom.

In addition, contrary to the intent of the bill's authors, bringing this measure to the floor gives us the opportunity to vote to add provisions to strengthen gun rights, such as an amendment to protect veterans from unfair restrictions when purchasing a firearm. I would filibuster passage of a final bill that contained any increased, gun restrictions or a weapons ban.

I have worked to protect and preserve the Second Amendment. Rather than adding new laws and regulatory burdens, Congress should focus on ways to make existing laws more effective. The goal should be to increase safety and punish criminals – not unfairly hurt law-abiding gun owners.

Be assured that as Congress considers gun control legislation I will continue to defend our right to bear arms. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can ever be of assistance.

With best wishes, I am

Sincerely yours,
Roger F. Wicker
U.S. Senate

It does make sense to force to into a floor debate. Hope he's shooting straight, pun intended.

They had basically the same thing in the newspaper this morning.

It should never make it to the floor, none of them understand the " shall not be infringed upon " part, makes me sick!!!

HUMMM, Here's what I got back

Thank you for contacting me to express your support for the constitutional right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms. I am glad to have the benefit of your views on this important issue.

Since coming to Congress in 1995, I have consistently voted to protect our Second Amendment freedoms and will continue to do so. On April 11, 2013, I supported, along with 15 other Republican Senators, a procedural motion on debating S. 649, the so-called Safe Schools Act.

I believe that S. 649 is deeply flawed legislation, and I oppose the measure. However, this vote signals the opening of a robust debate that will put the Senate on record regarding a basic constitutional right. Far from shrinking from it, I welcome such a discussion and believe it is long overdue.

The Founding Fathers conceived of the U.S. Senate as the proper forum for public deliberation of this kind. Law-abiding gun owners should not be put on the defensive when it comes to a fundamental American freedom.

In addition, contrary to the intent of the bill's authors, bringing this measure to the floor gives us the opportunity to vote to add provisions to strengthen gun rights, such as an amendment to protect veterans from unfair restrictions when purchasing a firearm. I would filibuster passage of a final bill that contained any increased, gun restrictions or a weapons ban.

I have worked to protect and preserve the Second Amendment. Rather than adding new laws and regulatory burdens, Congress should focus on ways to make existing laws more effective. The goal should be to increase safety and punish criminals – not unfairly hurt law-abiding gun owners.

Be assured that as Congress considers gun control legislation I will continue to defend our right to bear arms. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can ever be of assistance.

With best wishes, I am

Sincerely yours,
Roger F. Wicker
U.S. Senate

While he may be sincere, it leaves no doubt that he is an idiot. Sincerely. Worse still, he thinks we are dumb enough to accept the excuse.

By his reasoning, when they introduce a bill to execute the mentally handicapped of this country, he naturally should vote to bring it to the floor for a "robust debate".

Nice try Roger. But your still a soon to be unemployed, simpering idiot.

Wannabe...

and here's what I wrote back to him WB.



WOWWW. That's the exact same thing you wrote back to about 10 other people I personally know. Exact words so that means CUT/PASTE. All I can say is you better be very careful on the way you handle things with this. You're being back in office depends on it. To many folks are VERY hacked off at you right now and as of right now. will not vote for you again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wannabe...

While he may be sincere, it leaves no doubt that he is an idiot. Sincerely. Worse still, he thinks we are dumb enough to accept the excuse.

By his reasoning, when they introduce a bill to execute the mentally handicapped of this country, he naturally should vote to bring it to the floor for a "robust debate".

Nice try Roger. But your still a soon to be unemployed, simpering idiot.

Wannabe...

---

Shoulda known you can't just hit reply to one of his emails. I got this back

You've reached an unattended mailbox. Should you wish to respond to a communication you have received from my office, please go to my website at:

United States Senator Roger Wicker, Mississippi : Home

Thank you

I got the same reply.

I bet that response was written before they announced they were going to take it to the floor. Knew he was going to get heat. Better know he needs to start lining up one of them Lobyst jobs.

Do we have to elect somebody to take his place? I say we just kick them all out

Okay, here's a link to the bill: Text of S. 649: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013 (Placed on Calendar in the Senate version) - GovTrack.us

Now, I'm not a patient person and weeding through all the unnecessary verbiage wears me out, so I'm counting on those smarter than me to clarify this: it looks like they want to nationalize college campus security and have Homeland Security and FEMA right in the middle of it. Part of the language states this: "ensure coordination with campus public safety resources within the Department of Homeland Security, including within the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Department of Education;" and this: "promote the development and dissemination of effective behavioral threat assessment and management models to prevent campus violence;"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs. Crappie Stalker

Okay, here's a link to the bill: Text of S. 649: Safe Communities, Safe Schools Act of 2013 (Placed on Calendar in the Senate version) - GovTrack.us

Now, I'm not a patient person and weeding through all the unnecessary verbiage wears me out, so I'm counting on those smarter than me to clarify this: it looks like they want to nationalize college campus security and have Homeland Security and FEMA right in the middle of it. Part of the language states this: "ensure coordination with campus public safety resources within the Department of Homeland Security, including within the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Department of Education;" and this: "promote the development and dissemination of effective behavioral threat assessment and management models to prevent campus violence;"

---

Another power grab by homeland security to justify their existence..

Here's what I got from the The National Association for Gun Rights


Dear Mike ,

It was the most crucial Congressional vote on your right to keep and bear arms in twenty years.

Unfortunately, you’ve been betrayed!

The motion to proceed with Obama’s gun grab passed with the help of YOUR U.S. Senator, Roger Wicker.

That’s right -- Senator Roger Wicker just VOTED FOR President Obama’s anti-gun agenda -- and AGAINST your Second Amendment rights.

Of the 41 pro-gun Senators we needed to hold together and stand with Senators Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Ted Cruz (R-TX), we got 31.

Had just 10 more Senators voted "nay," we would have defeated this anti-gun legislation.

But supposedly “pro-gun” Senator Wicker sold you out for an anti-gun “deal” crafted behind the scenes at anti-gun Senator Joe Manchin's black-tie-booze-a-thon on his yacht on the Potomac.

Please contact Senator Roger Wicker and give him an earful!


Let him know you won’t forget about his betrayal of you and your Constitutional rights.

The fight goes on. This was just one step in the legislative process. While it was a crucial step, it is not the last opportunity we will have to stop it.

In fact, debate on this bill will continue into next week.

Gun grabbers will likely now try to load this bill with as much anti-gun legislation as they think they can get away with.

We here at the National Association for Gun Rights will continue to work day and night to keep you up to date on all of Congress’ anti-gun schemes.

Mike , to do that I need your help.

Please contact Senator Wicker right away.


Thank you.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown
Executive Vice President

P.S. Senator Roger Wicker betrayed you!

He voted FOR President Obama’s anti-gun agenda -- and AGAINST your Second Amendment rights earlier today.

Please contact Senator Roger Wicker and give him an earful!

Let him know you won’t forget about his betrayal of you and your Constitutional rights.