Not what you're thinking [emoji1]
Just wondering what people's favorite is. When looking for fish on structure do you prefer traditional 2D or down imaging ?
I lean towards DI myself.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
Printable View
Not what you're thinking [emoji1]
Just wondering what people's favorite is. When looking for fish on structure do you prefer traditional 2D or down imaging ?
I lean towards DI myself.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
Side Image to locate fish 100 % of the time .
I agree... SI to locate first. Then when I get to the structure located by the SI I switch to Down imaging to see the structure and the fish. Just my way out of many ways to do it.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app
2d advantage is pin pointing the structure under the boat to re-adjust a “mis-marked” waypoint ...
DI advantage is to see what’s in that structure once 2d has it pin pointed ...
——
In my Sonar seminars I use the analogy of an electrician in describing the unique use of each Sonar technology ...
An electrician goes to work with several different types of screw drivers (each with a specific purpose) ...
Thus, each Sonar technology is best utilized for specific purpose ... SI for finding stuff out to the side / 2d for pin pointing that stuff / DI for looking inside that stuff ...
Rickie
When I'm searching new areas or just looking for baitfish 2d for sure. When searching for stuff I know is there i use SI/DI in tandem.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Crappie.com Fishing mobile app