SI or DI

What are the pro's and con's of SI vs DI?

SI works best for people fishing shallow water and for finding fish structure covering a larger area faster. DI works great for deeper water and for pin pointing structure and fish after finding them. SI DI and 2D is all good and gooder especially after they made the screens colored. :twocents

I would consider a DI unit ..... but only to supplement an SI unit .... SI as a search tool to locate structure is awesome and a must have in my book. Even if you think you know the water you fish pretty well, you will find a LOT more stuff you didn't know existed with SI .... Works good in deeper water also.

If you want to spend some more bucks, consider the Onix which has great SI and DI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BobB

I would consider a DI unit ..... but only to supplement an SI unit .... SI as a search tool to locate structure is awesome and a must have in my book. Even if you think you know the water you fish pretty well, you will find a LOT more stuff you didn't know existed with SI .... Works good in deeper water also.

If you want to spend some more bucks, consider the Onix which has great SI and DI.

---

X2!

X3 ~ SI over DI 1st, the blended DI isn't too bad and DI just doesn't have the search coverage SI has....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Erin Brewer

What are the pro's and con's of SI vs DI?

---

IMHO -

Given the same depth of water and kHz setting:

SI is almost a 180deg span of sonar ping

DI is almost a 150deg span of sonar ping

SI is best at finding bottom cover and structure within the scope of the distance it is set for

DI is best at finding those things within a narrower range/distance

With that in mind, most people opt for using SI at the console when searching an area, then using DI at the bow for a closer look at target areas. They are better used in conjunction with each other, more so than alone.

Now, that's just my opinion ... and that's from someone that does not have a SI capable unit, only a DI bow mounted unit, and has little to no use for 2d sonar for fishing purposes. My 2d unit is console mounted and used solely for navigation purposes (by me) and depth of water notice to whomever is fishing from the back seat.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CrappiePappy

IMHO -

Given the same depth of water and kHz setting:

SI is almost a 180deg span of sonar ping

DI is almost a 150deg span of sonar ping

SI is best at finding bottom cover and structure within the scope of the distance it is set for

DI is best at finding those things within a narrower range/distance

With that in mind, most people opt for using SI at the console when searching an area, then using DI at the bow for a closer look at target areas. They are better used in conjunction with each other, more so than alone.

Now, that's just my opinion ... and that's from someone that does not have a SI capable unit, only a DI bow mounted unit, and has little to no use for 2d sonar for fishing purposes. My 2d unit is console mounted and used solely for navigation purposes (by me) and depth of water notice to whomever is fishing from the back seat.

---

Not a bad opinion...
I have 3 SI units and one DI unit - I use the SI far more locating fish and if I have to park over them, the DI unit draws a better picture under me than the SI generated DI images.

Thank you all for your response it def. helped... I wish I could buy both but can't at the moment!