Is it really as great for tightlining as I think it would be and let's see some of your images
Printable View
Is it really as great for tightlining as I think it would be and let's see some of your images
Team Beast has experienced mixed results with the 360. Appears to be most effective in the shallows.
I'll get Jordan Limit to get you some of our screen shots but should check out the shots from Cosmo, some of his screen shots are awesome!!
I found this tightlining video,on utube.this person has a great setup,and seams to be doing very well.If he we're to add a 360,to his setup.He would have the ability to see structure before he got over it and make adjustments as needed.Schools of bait fish show up really well also.There's lots of post were people say that 360,works best while stationary. While stationary,works.I believe it's better,with the boat moving. (Depends on what your needs are).https://youtu.be/F1JmziH23gU
Can't beat it. You need to go fishing with someone that has one. In about 5 minutes your mind will be made up.
Here's a video of brush .it's very easy to see and know exactly were it is. (The di, in this video is from a rotated since transducer)https://youtu.be/wx96OL7EG8s
for the 360 to work on your unit it has to be capable of side imaging correct, such as i would need a helix si unit for the 360 to work not just a di or regular 2d unit correct?
The only thing required, would be an ethernet capable unit.
so i could get a plain helix 10 that is just 2d and gps and hook it up to the 360 via ethernet and i would be good to go correct?
I went out with man who had one and it seemed to work ok
Correct ...Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbler
Rickie