Printable View
Here's a few from today. I've got to say that I do believe the 2d has improved with the 2.700 update, but I don't really see were chirping the Onix helps anything. I can set the unit to fixed frequencies and seems to work just fine.http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psovklxexx.jpg http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...pswmvkrbf9.jpghttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps5jzmbkgl.jpghttp://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps9hznknse.jpg
Kosmo, do you think the 2d may be improved mainly because the cone angle has changed with the update? I still thing the downimaging is way more useful for me- but I mainly fish for striper.
They CANT hide!!!! You catch any of em????? What were they???
Would have liked to have seen a DI image of that school. It gives me a headache to focus very long on the 360 images, and the 2d sonar (Chirp or not) just doesn't do it for me, anymore, now that I have a DI unit. :biggrin
... cp :kewl
I understand what your saying. I didn't have my di running today,. I'm trying out the 2d chirp, to get a feel for it. Those fish are probably Asian carp and your right, the DI would make it easier to tell what they are. (the 360 rocks tho) :cheers2Quote:
Originally Posted by CrappiePappy
I don't no? Is the cone angle different for each frequency? 83khz and the 200khz look different now also.Quote:
Originally Posted by skigill
I think the lower the freq, the greater the cone angle. Also mutliple freq(chirp) has a greater cone angle. My opinion, but I think chirp is over rated for water less than 100ft. Down imaging has better target separation also. But I'm usually moving following or finding schools of striper and bait.