These may be marketing images...but they still look pretty good...
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/garmin...7640783238243/
Rickie
Printable View
These may be marketing images...but they still look pretty good...
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/garmin...7640783238243/
Rickie
Yep,
Where are the fish.
I'm retired from my under water architecture job
:yikes rickie,those do look good:yikes
I like em'.
This is good that one more player with SI units appeared in the sonar market. I can not say that their images much better than Humminbird even 300 SI series:
http://www.crappie.com/crappie/showt...menting/page11
but I hope that my dream of having small, light SI unit with wide distinct side views will come true soon :)
The next is Raymarine SI unit.
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/801/z2p2.jpg
Rickie,would I be correct saying that the farther out the scanning,the more the chirp would help on si and the deeper the more on di ?Quote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc
There all great pictures,but this one caught my eye. http://i826.photobucket.com/albums/z...psxece9jrd.jpg
3 ' deep, 150' wide?
CHIRP's big advantage is the sweep of frequency ranges in each ping...
This allows more reflection data to be collected and returned to the xducer...more data = more detail...
And CHIRP allows more range with less energy needed to get the ping out farther...
It will be interesting to see some images from real users in the near future...
Rickie
rickie,with the garmin unit,are they switching between pulse and chirp.and if so,while there on chirp do they have the option to change between low,medium or high to compare to see which gives the best image at a particular range or depth ?Quote:
Originally Posted by rnvinc