Originally Posted by
Humminbird_Greg
True but only up to a certain point CP. While good programming can be used to root-sum-squared out most of the inherent inaccuracies in the GPS system (like: satellite clock errors, satellite orbit errors, atmospheric delays, multipath errors and receiver noise) it cannot help with RF noise issues that can cause inaccurate position measurements. Plus the government will not allow us to use the more accurate L2 signal (Precise code or “P-code”), so we are stuck with what we have. Now as the folks that run the GPS system upload more intelligent programming to the satellites, launch more standard satellites and geostationary satellites like the three WAAS satellites in orbit now (only two are fully operational), and as GPS Receivers adapt to the increased numbers of satellites and even gain the ability to use satellite systems from other countries: slow speed reading accuracy will increase as will the overall accuracy of any GPS Receiver that can take advantage of these.
Now, we could use some of those fancy algorithms and make a best guess as to your speed and course, but do you really want to go by a guess for this?