I'm running low

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by feeshrman

What if you were from Kentucky and booked a cash only trip with a guide who turned out to be a moron and got you or your loved one injured or worse. Now before anyone gets bent out of shape, i know Feelay should not fall in this category but their are some out there that may. What recourse would you have? If guides were regulated in some way, they and there customers would be protected and the only way to accomplish this is to make them get legit.

---

You're saying something completely different, now. Your earlier beef was they should pay more for their privileges. Now you're throwing out a hypothetical scenario and saying we need to have regulations to cover the "what ifs".
What makes the guides not legit. What laws are they breaking? I always believed that if a person was obeying the law in his chosen endeavor that he was legit.

Geesh,for once I have nothing to say. That's bad y'all, real bad!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slimeyslab

Geesh,for once I have nothing to say. That's bad y'all, real bad!

---

You OK, man? Hope the world keeps on turning. Take 2 aspirin and call somebody in the morning.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jigflinger

Still waitin!
Handi. AR has guide licensing. Hunting and fishing. It isn't lack of rules, regulation or license that created the problems in Arkansas. It was the lack of ethics from those that were licensed and regulated. Rules and regulations are only as good as those folks the rules apply to. So if Feelay is doing it right, why do you want penalize guides by imposing more rules on them.
What kind of example should they be setting?

Feesh, Feelay and the other guides bring more revenue into the state of Mississippi than the rest of us put together. Would you want that revenue to stop because the guides aren't paying more than you and me for the privilege of taking clients fishing. That's kinda short sighted. You ought to try guiding if you truly believe that's an easy way to "pad" your income. Ain't quite that easy.

---

Oh no, the word ethics again!! Flinger all I'm saying is that guides would be protecting themselves from any Joe Blow who wants to call themselves a guide. Heck, if you own a boat and take a guy fishing we are all guides under the MS regs. A small set of criteria would only protect the guys doing right in the first place. I have read up on several states that have laws regarding guiding and they only seem beneficial to those in the business of doing it right. And btw, anytime anyone ever ask me about a guide in MS I always tell em John Woods or Carl Painter.

Lets go fishing

Should a "guide" that only catches one fish be required to have a guide license? I ask this on Wb's behalf

Sometimes WB dosent have a fishing license or a watch either lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by "G"

Sometimes WB dosent have a fishing license or a watch either lol

---

Ouch! That will leave a mark, lol.....

I hate EVERYBOBY that has time to Fish.........So Pffffffffftttttttttt.........On all Yall.......:banghead::banghead:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slimeyslab

Should a "guide" that only catches one fish be required to have a guide license? I ask this on Wb's behalf

---

Hey, you made it through the might. The aspirin fixed you right up. Tolt ya!

"G", that's a great idea!