May as well let it go GD. A lot of people are closed minded and don't entertain it. Good luck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
May as well let it go GD. A lot of people are closed minded and don't entertain it. Good luck
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Big C, you seem to be missing the point, also. All we(those of us with closed minds) are asking for is sound biological data to support the rod limit change. None was cited in their release. The only thing cited was: about 25 letters and comments from the Enid meeting. GD is probably a real nice guy, never met him, but I don't think he is a biologist. Why don't we leave these things to the biologists? If they have conducted any studies and have biological data to back it up, let them publish it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
Lets keep it civil or the thread can be closed!
PM sentQuote:
Originally Posted by satdoc1
PM answered
Not gonna get in a pissing contest. But I have been on here long enough to know if you don't agree with the majority, you are wrong, end of story.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Been there done that fo sure!!!!:bangheadQuote:
Originally Posted by Big C
Your still a one eyed jack leg gewber. But you my buddyQuote:
Originally Posted by Big C
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
That's right stupid
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Watch it Flower boyQuote:
Originally Posted by Big C
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2