Your right they don't care one way are the other.
The corp as you know is part of the gov and under no circumstance do they ever want you the everyday joe to figure anything out. Otherwise they would not be able to waste your tax dollars.:deadhorse
Printable View
Your right they don't care one way are the other.
The corp as you know is part of the gov and under no circumstance do they ever want you the everyday joe to figure anything out. Otherwise they would not be able to waste your tax dollars.:deadhorse
Little off topic but will teckville have a ramp that is accessible now the water has fallen some? I fished out of it the past two weekends and didn't do much but would like to fish some in the morning.
Yes. You can put in at teckville as low as 244
They need to reevauleate the curve.They still use the same rule curve they started with when these lakes were built,with all the silt in they (lakes) don't hold the same amount of water.
Thanks petie
Don't want no reevaluating, by your theory they would them lower the curve. It is what it is, blessed to have the fisheries we have at a lot of our back door.
They are still the four best crappie lakes in the US...... just be glad we have them.
The Rule Curve deals with water level, not volume.
I was thinking raiseing curve not lowering.I'm just use 217ft for an example, if the curve they use is the origanal from when the lake was built.My thinking is with lets say 3ft of silt on the old 217 now day's should be 220ft they'r not holding the same amount of water at 217 as they did when the lake was built .But I know the corp is about moving water not holding water.Like yall just proud of what we have.
Sardis is not filling in. If you dont believe me just ask one of the rangers