Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0

View Poll Results: Which Way would you vote....Yes or No...

Voters
61. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I would vote for a 10" size limit for crappie on my lakes.

    45 73.77%
  • No, I would Not vote for a 10" size limit for crappie on my lakes.

    16 26.23%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Which Way Would You Vote Today?

  1. #1
    gabowman is offline Super Moderator * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Elberton, Georgia
    Posts
    39,166
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Which Way Would You Vote Today?


    Seems there's alot of discussions (and a bit of bickering or maybe some be-littling about each other's beliefs) between folks here about what's right or wrong about their keeper limits, so with all the talk that's been going on for several days now, I'm interested in which way would you vote if a size limit of 10" was voted for on the lakes that you like to fish? In this poll I have left only two choices...yes or no.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gray, Georgia
    Posts
    2,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yes, Yes, Yes. Does That Count Three Times. After Being At Talquin This Week My Opinion Is A Little Swayed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Dublin,Ga
    Posts
    981
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    For my preferred lake, Oconee... YES

    I do think it should be done on a lake by lake basis though. Lakes like sinclair need more than just a 10" size limit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    georgia
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 10" size limit

    This is a great way to preserve the future of the crappie fishing sport in the state of Georgia for all of us now and for our grandchildren.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Perry Ga
    Posts
    693
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I would vote yes

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Keeping small Crappie is unethical!

  7. #7
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I vote no because there's so many crappies in our lake that if they didn't take some of the smaller ones out, they'd be stunted. If they're going to eat them, take them.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    jones county outside of macon
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    yes

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Blue Ridge, Ga.
    Posts
    2,062
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I would vote yes for a 10" limit on the larger lakes. Chaunc made a good observation about over population leading to stunted fish. I don't think that would be a problem on lakes that have an abundance of shad, such as West Point, Lake Rusell, and Lake Harding, for example. I believe that we need size and creel limits on all lakes but they should be determined for each lake.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,307
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I guess everybody knows how I voted, but, it's just one the many ways we can give back to our fisheries instead of just taking and that's all I'm after, is to give back..
    Last edited by Outlaw1&2; 11-23-2009 at 12:43 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP