Likes Likes:  0
Thanks Thanks:  0
HaHa HaHa:  0
Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: DI for suspended crappie?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default DI for suspended crappie?


    There is certainly a few folks that would have you believe that DI will only work if you're moving, or is useless unless you are moving. The image below, is from a short trip to a local lake today. My speed is 0.0mph, and as long as I see the horizontal lines on my screen (crappie), I know I'm in the right place. Dropped a rig down to the bottom, up a couple cranks and wait. They were slamming it. The fish were suspended from the bottom up 5ft, and there was about a 10ft wide patch of them. Once you drifted outside the patch, the screen was blank.

    2d sonar, would not have shown anything close to this.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    754
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Seems that as long as you know how to interpret the image, movement isn't a requirement.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    You are correct.

  4. #4
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    What makes you say that 2d wont do that? I can remember when i had my eagle 480 seeing the same thing that you're talking about. When i'd anchor, all i'd be looking at was lines under the boat. As the screen scrolled, the fish always looked like straight lines. Cant say it showed them exactly like your shot as DI wasn't around then.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That shot is very similar. That probably wasn't the best choice in wording, and maybe sitting still is when they are closest in the right scenario. There was a lot of clutter that you aren't seeing in the DI on my image, (that did show on the 2d) I should have taken a screen shot of the split screen instead of NAV/DI
    Last edited by mduncan62; 03-05-2012 at 04:10 PM. Reason: Spelling

  6. #6
    chaunc's Avatar
    chaunc is offline 2014 Crappie.com Man of the Year * Crappie.com Supporter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sharon, Pa.
    Posts
    9,696
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Even when proven wrong, you just wont admit it, huh? Anyway... glad i didn't need lss-1 to show me that old shot from over 4 years ago.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    LOL. I looked at my 2d today, which is why I said it the way I did. I wasn't making the statement about all 2d units in the history of the world. I will try to be more specific in the future.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    160
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    If you had HB 360 they would look like fish...Rofl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MOKAN
    Posts
    4,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CarolinaJim View Post
    If you had HB 360 they would look like fish...Rofl

    Would they? Not sure I've seen a 360 image where fish looked like fish yet. At lest none that come close to what DI shows. Wow, One post about using DI and look at the bashing. Pretty impressive, although pretty much all off-topic.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    160
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Not bashing, it was a joke, hence the laughing emoticon.

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

BACK TO TOP