I agree, the AGFC will listen. They have not always done it and sometimes they still tend to be a little hard of hearing, but the repeated message will get through. I'll leave my beef with the AGFC for another site
Printable View
I agree, the AGFC will listen. They have not always done it and sometimes they still tend to be a little hard of hearing, but the repeated message will get through. I'll leave my beef with the AGFC for another site
Crappie tend to over populate in some fertile waters. The reason Nimrod has a big spawn ever year is spring floods as it is for flood control. Only folks wanting reduced limits is those not catching fish.
Better be careful transplanting fish , not only illegal but could spread diseases and parasites!
i'm against any statewide reg regarding limit. the state has enough regulatory power over us as it is. i see no valid reason to give them more unless there is scientific proof a size limit is needed. if there are population issues on some waters (after a thorough scientific evaluation by trained biologists on said waters), then i would agree with some size limits on that (or those) waters only. a cookie cutter approach is rarely good for the general population.
Boy you can sure tell when it gets hot outside and everyone in sitting in the AC
I've always wondered what is so magical about a 10" crappie...my favorite eating crappie is about the size of a big bream...anything big enough to fillet I save for the wife and kids...10 years ago the crappie on Charles were the perfect size to eat...after the slot limit (10") the crappie are so small I dont pursue them...not everyone fishes for fillet size crappie...it is obvious to me that the crappie in Charles do not get enough to eat...